406
Judge denies HP's plea to throw out all-in-one printer lockdown lawsuit
(www.theregister.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2023
406 points (98.8% liked)
Technology
59436 readers
1159 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
This and almost every other tech subscription style "service" are one of the most maddening things to come out of the tech sector. The need for profit is absolutely out of control.
I'm so tired of everything becoming an ongoing subscription. In the end the most powerful vote we all have is our wallets.
It's a pretty easy thing to just immediately stop buying from companies that pull this shit.
The way that these companies use intellectual property law to secure for themselves a property right to something that someone else purchased from them ought to be highly illegal.
I believe there was a supreme Court case I better garage door opener, and the company that made the garage doors was trying to sue because they didn't want anyone using anything but their garage door opener. I could be mistaken, but I'm pretty sure that the supreme Court in that case explicitly stated that the purpose of the dmca is not to provide companies with a property right to something that people have already purchased.
Technology companies just went ahead and did it anyway.