406
Judge denies HP's plea to throw out all-in-one printer lockdown lawsuit
(www.theregister.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2023
406 points (98.8% liked)
Technology
59436 readers
1159 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
The problem with fining incredibly rich corporations, is they either laugh it off, or just pass that "cost" onto the consumers.
I suppose the options are things like:
a) International regulation against "disabling parts of a product without good reason". Products simply cannot be sold legally
b) Enforced warning signs on packets (like cigarette packaging) - each HP printer box or online advert must display a warning sign covering 60% of all images stating "We are a predatory company and will disable your products for no good reason".
If those don't work, then death penalty for top 3 highest ranking of the company and top 3 highest paid of the company, per violation, per year.
I think the death penalty option is the most reasonable and effective one.
Eventually "passing the cost on to consumers" increases the price so much that the deceptive printers cost more than legitimate ones.
my honest and well thought through opinion
Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/dyIilW_eBjc
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.