110
submitted 2 weeks ago by Deceptichum@quokk.au to c/world@quokk.au

During a briefing with reporters, Jon Kosloski, director of the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office, admitted that the U.S. government is stumped by several “true anomalies.” According to Kosloski, “There are interesting [UFO] cases that I, with my physics and engineering background and time in the [intelligence community], I do not understand. And I don’t know anybody else who understands them either.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip -3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

So, I may or may not sound like a crazy person here but...

I fully believe that something that has been called the 'TR-3b' is absolutely real, and is such a highly classified craft... though different people use different names.

I've seen this thing multiple times, once hovering only a hundred feet or so over ... whatever the exact building/hangar near the 'Fly Away Cafe' at Boeing Field in Seattle is.

Large, equilateral triangular craft. Basically the size of that entire hangar, if you want to measure it on google maps or something.

Has a thruster near each point of the triangle, and a larger ... glowing something or other in the center.

The theory is that it uses some kind of extremely advanced, exotic method to ... not entirely negate gravity, but functionally reduce the weight and this felt inertia of the craft by about 90%.

This enables it to hover and loiter for extremely long periods of time, and also make sudden accelerations... as, if this is theory is true.... it functionally has a star trek style inertial dampener.

https://www.defencestreet.com/tr-3-black-manta/

https://www.military.com/video/aircraft/military-aircraft/tr-3b-aurora-anti-gravity-spacecrafts/2860314511001

This is of course an artist rendition, but it most accurately captures what I've seen (though every time I saw it, it was hovering level, the tilt here is so you can get a good grasp of what it looks like)

Of course, if you look into this, take everything you read with an entire fistful of salt.

Not only are there tons of cranks and wannabe ufologists adding in nonsense details, but it has been shown that the military will absolutely engane in intentional disinformation to keep things even more confused.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=SSTsW_wFn_U&pp=ygUOcGF1bCBiZW5uZXdpdHo%3D

[-] thedeadwalking4242@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

I would say if it was so highly classified you wouldn’t have seen it. There’s a lot of room on this planet to hide aircraft like that and zipping it around Seattle is probably not the best idea lol

[-] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

A few of the times I've seen it included friends and bystanders who also saw the same thing at the same time and place.

Could it be of some other origin? Sure, I guess, but that seems like an even more fantastical explanation to me.

I'm just going with an explanation that has at least some backing of documentation and discussion in the publications revolving around military aircraft technology, as well as patents.

To me this seems the least implausible, it seems more plausible than explanations that have basically 0 technical documentation.

Could I be wrong about what this thing is? Could all or some of this documentation be wrong or intentionally misleading?

Of course.

But there at least is a bit of a paper trail.

https://www.sandboxx.us/news/the-legendary-aircraft-people-think-america-operates-in-secret/

https://www.sandboxx.us/news/airpower/tr-3b-does-america-have-a-reverse-engineered-ufo/

https://ayuba.fr/pdf/pope1991.pdf

https://archive.aviationweek.com/issue/19910610

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

That's true, but it also takes a lot of staffing for these projects, and these people don't generally want to be isolated like Los Alamos, they want to have normal lives. Even Area 51 isn't that far from Vegas.

this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2024
110 points (88.7% liked)

World News

383 readers
459 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be a decent person
  2. No spam
  3. Add the byline, or write a line or two in the body about the article.

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS