7
Calling Indigenous lore science marks Ed Husic’s ignorance
(www.theaustralian.com.au)
A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.
If you're posting anything related to:
If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News
This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:
Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition
Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:
https://aussie.zone/communities
Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.
Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone
The onus of proving a point in an article of their construction should be on the author.
Anyway, here's an article: https://australian.museum/learn/first-nations/indigenous-science/.
Another: https://blog.qm.qld.gov.au/2012/08/01/science-principles-in-traditional-aboriginal-australia/
A website of resources (Australian council of deans of science): https://www.acds.edu.au/teaching-learning/indigenous-science/
Food detoxification by indigenous people: https://www.scienceflip.com.au/subjects/chemistry/equilibriumandacidreactions/learn10/
https://scienceready.com.au/pages/aboriginal-detoxification-methods?srsltid=AfmBOop0v07LPvhyOAoNohVwoF6XHWgw-XgvskBWCe-Ua2Vf2iQmk4JG
If you're after an artifact with a written hypothesis from an exclusively spoken language society, I can't help you there.
The article, while not great, is clearly the refutation of claims made by Ed Husic. The onus of proof would then be on Ed.
From your first link
This completely dismisses that science is a formalised practice of the scientific method and is akin to claiming that any knowledge is science which I reject.
I have yet to read the other sources provided, which I will get to when I have the time.