226
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2024
226 points (99.1% liked)
Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.
5373 readers
872 users here now
Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.
As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades:
How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:
Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:
Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Trump will overturn this almost instantly the moment he gets into power. This is just a gesture. He should have done it sooner.
I feel like sometimes people just read the headline, grab for the most near-at-hand thought pattern that corresponds to it within their collection of prejudices, and click "Send."
There's also some discussion of what Biden did earlier in his administration, how the industry responded, why they're trying to accelerate getting this into place right now, and so on. It's actually a lot more complex than the headline. Who knew.
I don’t see how what you quoted negates the original comment.
It's a multinational agreement, many of the signatories of which Trump will not be in charge of in any sense. And, even the US agency impacted is in theory "independent," which under Biden gave them some leeway to ignore his instructions to them. Although, Trump will surely mount an attack on that.
The point that I was making, which the article goes into more depth about, is that this is not just outside the executive branch, but a fully independent agency. Trump can attack it, sure, but he can't "overturn" the OECD, and getting this accomplished is not at all just a gesture.
More information is in the article.
Anything Trump has to undo is still time he has to spend undoing it