644
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 160 points 5 months ago

Anyone who does not understand the sunk cost fallacy should not be in management.

You've spent $x on office space. You can:

A. Use it, and make your employees hate working for you or

B. Let it go unused, and your employees are happier to continue working for you.

The money is spent either way. The only difference is morale, which does in fact directly contribute to your bottom line.

[-] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 66 points 5 months ago

C. Get rid of what you don't need so that everyone is happy

[-] Sabin10@lemmy.world 35 points 5 months ago

When you are locked in to a 3/5/10 year lease for the space, that's not actually an option. Most leases signed pre covid should be up by now but clueless management probably renewed anyways.

[-] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago

And the really big corporations own their buildings. You think the company locked into leases are mad? The companies who own the building are pissed! Some have a multi million dollar building that's losing value faster than the speed of light.

[-] whostosay@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago

Good. Turn that shit into housing.

[-] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

No shit. But this is America... You already know that proposition is dead on arrival.

[-] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Nihilism is cool and all, but smart thoughtful people are working really hard on this and it’s not easy - unless you create windowless tenements with no plumbing.

[-] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

First part of finding a solution is admitting to the problem. For the change we need, the wealthy and powerful need to be removed.

[-] makyo@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Are sublets not an option?

[-] blazeknave@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago

You mean sell it for money and actually make more profit while everyone is happy? Preposterous!

[-] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 17 points 5 months ago

Or c, keep just enough office space to create rolling “layoffs” as people are asked to return to the office.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 20 points 5 months ago

Step 1: Hire staff

Step 2: Train staff to do job

Step 3: COVID! Oh no! Everyone work from home.

Step 4: ???

Step 5: Fire staff to save money.

Step 6: Profit.

[-] SpikesOtherDog@ani.social 11 points 5 months ago

It's nice to find the rant in your head written out. A previous employer of mine dropped two properties in favor of a store front.

[-] Cornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

C. Sublet out the property and make back the cost of the lease or even a bit of profit.

[-] grey_maniac@lemmy.ca 5 points 5 months ago

They can't depreciate the assets and use them as a deduction if it doesn't count as an office expense. That only qualifies if a threshhold minimum number of workers spend a threshhold minimum amount of time in the office.

[-] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 months ago

There have to be relationships at play or something like that. Or saving face. Maybe investments?

this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2024
644 points (98.9% liked)

Work Reform

12364 readers
80 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS