752
submitted 1 month ago by Jomega@lemmy.world to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago

I think "plagiarism" refers to taking credit for the work of others. Using other people's work to make your own isn't "plagiarism" if you give credit. This doesn't mean AI is good, just that "plagiarism" isn't the correct word.

[-] YummyYugi@ani.social 1 points 1 month ago

How many songs credit every sample and loop?

[-] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

What I said was

[It] isn't "plagiarism" if you give credit.

This is different from saying "If you don't give credit, it's plagiarism."

Put another way: it is sufficient for something to not be plagiarism if all materials are credited, but that doesn't necessarily mean everything that doesn't do that is plagiarism per-se. It is beyond the scope of my musings to reckon the minimum requirement of non-accreditation for something to qualify as "plagiarism".

this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2024
752 points (92.6% liked)

196

16856 readers
1789 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS