212
After backing Trump, low-income voters hope he doesn’t slash their benefits
(www.washingtonpost.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 26 Dec 2024
212 points (96.1% liked)
News
23786 readers
1213 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
"He's not going to hurt the poor. He's too smart for that."
Oh, you infuriating fucking summer child. It'd be hilarious if I wasn't stuck in this hellbound handbasket with the rest of you fucking mongoloids.
That's their logic .... they weren't thinking "He's not going to hurt the poor" ....
They were thinking "He's not going to hurt ME! He's going to hurt other people I don't like."
I've actually heard Maga people admit they'll get hurt by these policies, but immigrants and homos will get hurt MOAR!, y'know, like Jesus taught, so it's cool.
Yep. The GOP has worked tirelessly for decades to convince people that we are not capable of helping everyone. That it's a zero-sum game, and someone else receiving something means that another more deserving person (AKA straight/white/cis/etc.) must be deprived of the thing.
Therefore, since our government is incapable of providing for all, in their minds (because the Republicans have made sure of it), then the next best thing is making sure nobody gets the thing. Especially someone who doesn't "deserve" it.
Good ol American rugged individualism.
A friendly reminder that "mongoloid" is a racist pejorative, and that the government of Mongolia literally ran a campaign decades ago to get people to stop doing it.
I did not know that and will adjust accordingly.
As much as I respect Ghengis Khan and his ilk, I will not stop listening to that Devo song.
Well they deserve their benefits unlike those other poors who are in a bad spot due to their own faults.
See......I don't look at it that way. It's not funny to me, even if I weren't affected.
It's like watching a blind kitten running into a house that's on fire. I don't laugh at the soon to be burning kitten. I cry for the suffering that's about to take place.
Yes, the kitten chose to run into a burning house. Yes the kitten SHOULD HAVE known that's a bad idea.
.....but they didn't. They didn't know what they were truely doing. And now it's time to suffer from the obvious bad situation you just ran into.
Only difference is, the kitten fire is now affecting the whole country.
Yeeeeaah... but see, your analogy not coincidentally fails, since the kitten is just ignorant.
It would be more accurate if the kitten ran into the burning house because some fat, smelly old tom told it that if it did, the tom and his buddies would destroy the lives of everyone the kitten hates.
So yeah - there's a lot of ignorance there, but the foundation that makes that ignorance relevant and effective is bigotry and hatred and an utter and complete lack of empathy or integrity. If the kitten wasn't so blinded by its hatred and cruelty, "run into this burning house to destroy someone else's life" wouldn't have been an effective appeal.
That's a bad analogy. In this situation, the kittens voted to set the house in fire because there's a puppy in a different room that they don't like and it will get burned too. It's hateful, willful ignorance and a desire to hurt others.