40
submitted 2 weeks ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago

And find themselves without fault?

[-] metaldream@sopuli.xyz 19 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Maybe Harris and the Democrats should've spent less time chasing Republicans and fascists for votes.

I voted for her btw. But is incredible how Dem voters repeatedly allow their leadership to be so weak and outt of touch.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago

And maybe people who repeatedly told others "don't vote for Harris" should claim some culpability for people not voting for Harris...

But it's amazing that every time I suggest that, someone has to talk about the faults of the Harris campaign as if you can't blame more than one party. It's whataboutism.

If you [general you] tell people not to vote for Harris and they don't vote for Harris and then Trump wins, you have some culpability.

[-] metaldream@sopuli.xyz 9 points 2 weeks ago

Those people weren't running for president. They may be culpable but it's no where near the same level as the actual party leadership.

Dems conveniently blame everyone but their own leadership every time they lose an election and therefore never learn anything from it.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Cool. I'm not a Democrat and this isn't about the Democrats. This is about the people who wanted others to not vote for Harris. Stop trying to change the subject.

[-] CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee -1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Who are these people you're claiming said "don't vote for Harris?" You and I had plenty of back and fourths before and after the election about what a shit job Biden (and then Harris) was doing campaigning but I never once told anyone who to vote for and I don't recall anyone else doing that either. You seem to conflate "valid criticism of a candidate and their policies" to "telling you who to vote for" and that just isn't the case.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

You have a very poor memory if you claim you don't remember anyone saying to not vote for Harris. Considering it's even mentioned in the headline of this post, a very poor memory indeed.

[-] CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee -1 points 2 weeks ago

It's mentioned in the title in reference to some far-flung group not represented here. I'm talking about here on Lemmy.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

If you are going to pretend the many people on Lemmy who very vociferously told people to not vote for Harris did not exist, please do not let me be the one to disabuse you of that. You go ahead and enjoy the rich fantasy where that never happened.

[-] verdantbanana@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

not the voters' job to make themselves buyable

that is all on the candidates

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

We are not talking about the voters or the candidates here. We are talking about the people telling voters not to vote for someone and then pretending they had no culpability whatsoever when that person loses. Thank you for proving my point.

[-] verdantbanana@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

People told others not to vote Harris because she sucked as a candidate

Not the citizens' fault billionaires rigged the election again

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

I see you don't understand cause and effect.

If you tell someone not to do something and then they don't do it, you're part of the cause.

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

TYpIcAl ShItLiB LoGiC /s

[-] WanderingVentra@lemm.ee -1 points 1 week ago

If they're telling people not to vote for someone because they're doing something they can by all accounts stop doing, then it's still on the candidate.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Yes, I understand both you and Mr. Banana, who went out of his way to constantly tell people not to vote for Harris every single day on Lemmy up through the first day in November, you want to divorce your words from any actual real effect they might have.

It's very Republican of both of you.

[-] WanderingVentra@lemm.ee -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

You might have me mistaken for someone else. I went out of my way to get people to vote for her but also knew she was doomed if she kept up her current path because I recognized what happened in 2016 and so kept criticizing her for supporting the genocide. I tried to set up a freaking vote exchange thread to swap votes with people in swing states even and got criticized by people here for even trying. I was trying harder than most people here because I recognized the danger and the patterns, instead of burying my head in the sand. I felt like freaking Cassandra lol.

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Yes let us hold blameless those who didn't give enough of a shit to piss on America when it was on fire. Your true colors show here.

this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2024
40 points (97.6% liked)

News

23786 readers
1227 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS