31
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2023
31 points (100.0% liked)
Explain Like I'm Five
14292 readers
3 users here now
Simplifying Complexity, One Answer at a Time!
Rules
- Be respectful and inclusive.
- No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
- Engage in constructive discussions.
- Share relevant content.
- Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
- Use appropriate language and tone.
- Report violations.
- Foster a continuous learning environment.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
You are talking about the Alice and Bob situations.
Alice has a pair of keys. Private and public.
Bob has a pair of keys private and public.
Bob and Alice swap public keys.
Alice uses bobs public key to encrypt a message, when Bob receives the message he uses his private key to decrypt the message.
The private keys that do the decryption are never swapped. Only the public key are swapped which allow encryption.
If some else has bobs public key, they can not decrypt a message because the key they intercepted is used for encryption.
There is also another method called a Diffie-Hellman exchange. Where Bob and allice still swap public keys but Bob uses his private key and allices public key to do a maths equation to get a secret. Allice will use her private key and bobs public key doing the same math equations will result in the same number.
So the secret was never shared between them they both did the same equation and came to the same result.
With Diffie-Hellman, wouldn't the two private keys need to be the same to give the same result?
No. The wiki article explains it better than I can.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diffie%E2%80%93Hellman_key_exchange
The two private keys represent two channels of information flow. One channel for each direction.
When Alice talked to Bob, they’re using Bob’s keys. When Bob talks to Alice, they’re using Alice’s keys.
If it’s a “two-way” conversation, that’s just two separate one-way channels being combined at the end into what seems like a single, two-way channel.