11
submitted 5 days ago by jack@hexbear.net to c/earth@hexbear.net
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SmokinStalin@hexbear.net 1 points 3 days ago

Geography olays a big role there. There are many places where the capacity of hydro needed requires more than is environmentally safe to dam. We would have to have gigantic mega projects to build new lakes and resivoirs. (Much slower and more labor intensive than building nuclear plants)

If nuclear doesn't fill the gaps it will be fossil fuels.In the current moment, an 'always no matter what' anti nuclear stance is just a pro oil and coal stance.

[-] Lawn_and_disorder@hexbear.net 1 points 2 days ago

How much resivoirs does denmark have? You just bought imto nuclear pro stance

this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2025
11 points (86.7% liked)

Earth

12895 readers
2 users here now

The world’s #1 planet!

A community for the discussion of the environment, climate change, ecology, sustainability, nature, and pictures of cute wild animals.

Socialism is the only path out of the global ecological crisis.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS