188
submitted 17 hours ago by geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml to c/usa@lemmy.ml

Jury nullification is the term for when a jury declines to convict a defendant despite overwhelming evidence of guilt. This can be a form of civil disobedience, a political statement against a specific law, or a show of empathy and support to the defendant.

“It’s not a legal defense sanctioned under the law,” said Cheryl Bader, associate professor of law at Fordham School of Law. “It’s a reaction by the jury to a legal result that they feel would be so unjust or morally wrong that they refuse to impose it, despite what the law says.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Shortstack@reddthat.com 49 points 16 hours ago

Never thought I’d see a mainstream outlet discussing this. There’s less plausible deniability for potential jurors now

[-] orcrist@lemm.ee 8 points 5 hours ago

I am confident some evidence will be debatable. It's quite possible that jurors can honestly say they aren't convinced beyond a reasonable doubt. The arrest alone is bizarre, and the trial will bring all sorts of things.

[-] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee 27 points 16 hours ago

They can't dismiss all the jury candidates...

[-] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 14 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Welcome to the United States of America, where the justice system is a cruel and unusual joke and only for the working class.

[-] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago

Soon it’ll just be twelve AI models

this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2025
188 points (99.5% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7378 readers
703 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS