188
submitted 17 hours ago by geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml to c/usa@lemmy.ml

Jury nullification is the term for when a jury declines to convict a defendant despite overwhelming evidence of guilt. This can be a form of civil disobedience, a political statement against a specific law, or a show of empathy and support to the defendant.

“It’s not a legal defense sanctioned under the law,” said Cheryl Bader, associate professor of law at Fordham School of Law. “It’s a reaction by the jury to a legal result that they feel would be so unjust or morally wrong that they refuse to impose it, despite what the law says.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Belly_Beanis@hexbear.net 9 points 11 hours ago

One reason it exists is because there's no way to force jurors to rule a certain way. Once jurors go into deliberation, what happens in that room stays in that room.

Taken to its logical conclusion, there's nothing stopping a jury from voting unanimously either way. They could vote to convict a person they think is innocent (which happens, especially when used against minorities and especially during Jim Crow). They could vote "not guilty" for a person they think is guilty.

this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2025
188 points (99.5% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7378 readers
812 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS