710
rule (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) by hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone

Guys, at this rate I don't think the revolution's going to happen anytime soon.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] drosophila@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

It was cooked up by Milton Friedman, one of the grandfathers of American free market libertarianism.

The whole impetus of UBI was to eliminate traditional social services because, it is argued, there's no way that a government institution could be as efficient or effective as a free market.

And make no mistake, even modern proponents of UBI such as Andrew Yang propose funding it by hollowing out existing social services.

Like, yeah, UBI is better than having literally no social support at all, but the fact that its seen as this ultra-leftist idea, to the point that we apparently can't even conceive of how it could possibly "not be left enough", is an indication of how far right mainstream politics has shifted.

[-] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 hours ago

If we were smarter than an idiocracy we would understand that "UBI is higher than unconditional social benefits received, and without any administrative overhead that makes the programs more expensive than what we receive"... I like more money is where your thinking could successfully stop at.

this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2025
710 points (97.3% liked)

196

16814 readers
2912 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS