89
submitted 1 year ago by will_a113@lemmy.ml to c/science@lemmy.ml

What's that saying again? Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence? I don't think we're quite there yet, but for all of you MOdified Newtonian Dynamics fans (and Dark Matter haters) out there here's a bit of good news.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Lilnino@beehaw.org 28 points 1 year ago

I hate this title, even though it's a good article. It's nothing to do with gravity "breaking down"; maybe oul the current THEORY of gravity breaking down. So annoying that titles need to be sensationalized.

[-] Chetzemoka@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

Well, it is a direct quote from the published study, so maybe not the journalist's fault this time:

"direct evidence for the breakdown of standard gravity at weak acceleration” and reveal “an immovable anomaly of gravity in favor of MOND-based modified gravity"

[-] jalda@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 year ago

So it would be a breakdown of standard gravity, not of gravity full stop. Sensationalized headline.

[-] will_a113@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

Yeah, a better title would have been "new observations show gravity anomaly indicating that current dark matter theories are incomplete", but you get fewer clicks with something like that, right?

this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2023
89 points (91.6% liked)

Science

13257 readers
105 users here now

Subscribe to see new publications and popular science coverage of current research on your homepage


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS