397
rule (lemm.ee)
submitted 1 month ago by Irelephant@lemm.ee to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] secret300@lemmy.sdf.org 43 points 1 month ago

Bluesky is just going to turn into twitter in a few years. How does no one see the issue with one company owning a platform?!

[-] thisfro@slrpnk.net 11 points 1 month ago

Maybe bluesky might take a bit longer, but I don't see how threads is any better than twitter.

Just a different asshat running the company

[-] Irelephant@lemm.ee 10 points 1 month ago

Honestly, threads was only popular because of it being fused with instagram, so you would already have an audience and because it was the simplest alternative at the time.

[-] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 7 points 1 month ago

You need to have a couple of explicitly anticapitalist thoughts to see the issue with it. So yeah, most won't see the issue with it.

[-] can@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago

People aren't thinking that critically. Maybe they need to experience the cycle a couple more times.

[-] morphballganon@mtgzone.com -2 points 1 month ago

If it does, a new alternative will pop up, no biggie

[-] Irelephant@lemm.ee -2 points 1 month ago

While you can critisise its decentralisation, it is still in development. There is an effort (https://freeourfeeds.com/, cory doctorow supports it) to host atproto infrastructure outside of bsky's control.

[-] phuntis@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

it is not still in development decentralisation on bluesky is vapourware it will never exist it's just part of the standard EEE cycle it's marketing they'll say it didn't work out and cancel it the second they become the predominant platform

[-] Irelephant@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

You dropped these: ,....

Punctuation aside, I find that hard to believe, they literally started out as a way to make twitter decentralised after jack dorsey got ✨inspired✨ by a paper on decentralisation. Decentralization on bluesky does exist, they got a lot of flack for banning a trans person who pointed out their head of t&s liked barely legal porn, but she just made her own pds (because bsky is open source) and is now untouchable. All it needs is account moving and to fix up did:plc a bit and it should be decent. I'd reccomend reading @cwebber@social.coop s article about it, points out its strenghts and weaknesses quite well. https://dustycloud.org/blog/how-decentralized-is-bluesky/ https://dustycloud.org/blog/re-re-bluesky-decentralization/ . I myself am annoyed at bluesky simply because I am a big fan of mastodon, but its already won.

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca -2 points 1 month ago

The issue is size

If it was federated the same problems would arise, see lemmy

There needs to be user caps

[-] Irelephant@lemm.ee 1 points 2 weeks ago

I disagree. Lemmy didn't work well because it wasn't designed to scale. With atproto, it is less resource intensive if users aren't spread out, in contrast to acitivtypub where its the opposite.

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 weeks ago

The problem isn’t resources, it’s reach of disinformation

this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2025
397 points (93.6% liked)

196

17019 readers
677 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS