43
submitted 3 months ago by MelonYellow@lemmy.ca to c/science@lemmy.world

His answer is the octopus. What say you?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] scarabic@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I’m not even convinced that intelligence is a requirement to be the dominant species. Intelligence is so expensive that nature rarely ever selects for it.

Trilobytes did pretty damn well for a hell of a lot longer than we have so far. I think we need a stronger working definition of “dominant” in order to judge any candidates.

[-] FundMECFS@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 months ago

But the reason he gives for them becoming the dominant species is their intelligence.

[-] scarabic@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Sure well if that is a precondition of the conversation, we can talk about it. But IMO it may be a faulty assumption to go on.

this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2025
43 points (77.2% liked)

science

18158 readers
153 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS