419
submitted 2 weeks ago by fu@libranet.de to c/memes@lemmy.ml

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] lukewarm_ozone@lemmy.today 10 points 2 weeks ago

This roughly checks out. I'm getting 66%, based on the methodology of cutting out the jug's shape from the picture and numerically integrating the filled and empty volume (e.g. if a row is d pixels wide, it contributes d^2 to the volume, either filled or empty depending on whether it's above or below the water level).

[-] fu@libranet.de 1 points 2 weeks ago
[-] lukewarm_ozone@lemmy.today 2 points 1 week ago

The thing I said I did? Yes; here's the processed image:

If you mean the math in the post, I can't read it in this picture but it's probably just some boring body-of-rotation-related integrals, so basically the same thing as I did but breaking apart the vase's visible shape into analytically simple parts, whereas I got the shape from the image directly.

this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2025
419 points (95.8% liked)

Memes

46386 readers
1976 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS