15
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by UniversalMonk@lemmy.kya.moe to c/casualconversation@lemm.ee

I have two cars, but I actually hate cars.

I chose to have a house in the mountains, but I hate snow.

I work out hard and have abs that I show off, but people who show off their abs annoy me.

I'm a writer and make income doing it in addition to my retirement pension, but writers annoy me and I never tell my friends that I'm a writer.

I also paint and have had my stuff in some galleries, but artists annoy me and I never tell any of my friends that I paint.

I've chosen all those things. Not by necessity, but just choice. Can you be a contrarian to your own views or does that definition have to involve opposing someone else's views just to troll?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Vanth@reddthat.com 0 points 2 days ago

Late stage capitalism sucks, yet I have a corporate middle management job and I drink Coke and I drive a Toyota and I'm surfing Lemmy on a Google device. I don't think I'm trolling. And I don't know if it's even that contrarian. "There is no ethical consumption under capitalism"; unless I am ready to die, I have to participate in the system.

[-] UniversalMonk@lemmy.kya.moe 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I don’t think I’m trolling.

Thanks for saying that. I get a LOT of people who follow me on Lemmy and call me a troll. As in, there was a thread started last week to try to ban me from the entire fediverse (which of course didn't work).

But I'm not a troll, I just have lots of different varying and seemingly opposing viewpoints. It's not done "to spite others," it's done "in spite of others."

That's why I think you and I are different than trolls and/or hypocrites.

So maybe contrarian isn't the right word, but I don't know what else I would call it. But I don't have seemingly opposing views to piss people off. It's just how I am.

My hate-fanclub peeps worked on this just last week. Notice the 318 upvotes to get rid of me:

[-] shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee 2 points 2 days ago

How can you be a troll when you joined today?

[-] UniversalMonk@lemmy.kya.moe 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Oh, I've been around. I had to diversify and spread out my name. I'm transparent and use same username across instances because it's not about ban evasion, it's about not being centralized. I love the fediverse!

[-] shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

You can count on me not to fall into that category of people. You can even talk to me anytime you want with no anxiety attached.

[-] UniversalMonk@lemmy.kya.moe 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Wow, that's very thoughtful!

And the same invitation goes out to you as well. Please feel free to DM me anytime about anything.

I don't have a discord, but I should make one. Until then, DM me here (or if I get banned from this instance) from any of my other instances. I use the same username for them.

I'm on the lemm.ee instance as well.

[-] ZDL@ttrpg.network 1 points 17 hours ago

Have you ever speculated as to why you get banned so often?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2025
15 points (89.5% liked)

Casual Conversation

1910 readers
139 users here now

Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you'll make some friends in the process.


RULES (updated 1/22/25)

  1. Be respectful: no harassment, hate speech, bigotry, and/or trolling. To be concise, disrespect is defined by escalation.
  2. Encourage conversation in your OP. This means including heavily implicative subject matter when you can and also engaging in your thread when possible. You won't be punished for trying.
  3. Avoid controversial topics (politics or societal debates come to mind, though we are not saying not to talk about anything that resembles these). There's a guide in the protocol book offered as a mod model that can be used for that; it's vague until you realize it was made for things like the rule in question. At least four purple answers must apply to a "controversial" message for it to be allowed.
  4. Keep it clean and SFW: No illegal content or anything gross and inappropriate. A rule of thumb is if a recording of a conversation put on another platform would get someone a COPPA violation response, that exact exchange should be avoided when possible.
  5. No solicitation such as ads, promotional content, spam, surveys etc. The chart redirected to above applies to spam material as well, which is one of the reasons its wording is vague, as it applies to a few things. Again, a "spammy" message must be applicable to four purple answers before it's allowed.
  6. Respect privacy as well as truth: Don’t ask for or share any personal information or slander anyone. A rule of thumb is if something is enough info to go by that it "would be a copyright violation if the info was art" as another group put it, or that it alone can be used to narrow someone down to 150 physical humans (Dunbar's Number) or less, it's considered an excess breach of privacy. Slander is defined by intentional utilitarian misguidance at the expense (positive or negative) of a sentient entity. This often links back to or mixes with rule one, which implies, for example, that even something that is true can still amount to what slander is trying to achieve, and that will be looked down upon.

Casual conversation communities:

Related discussion-focused communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS