9
Ground.news and RT.com
(libranet.de)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2025
9 points (100.0% liked)
World News
22994 readers
29 users here now
Breaking news from around the world.
News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.
Guidelines for submissions:
- Where possible, post the original source of information.
- If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
- Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
- Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
- Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
- Social media should be a source of last resort.
These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.
For US News, see the US News community.
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Aside from the organization's charter mandating editorial independence, the BBC being publicly-funded by the country's annual broadcasting fee ensures that it does not need to pander to politicians to conduct its operations. It's far more effective at this than PBS, which is more likely to be biased due to its need for corporate and charitable sponsors.
RT in contrast is only accountable to the Russian government, and ultimately Putin, and is thus unable to maintain editorial independence from the government's national and foreign policy interests.
@zante
Do you?
Ifyou want to criticize the BBC (or other public media in the West) you'll find a lot of reasons, but your comments here are outright Russian and Chinese propanda narratives that are blatantly false. A BBC journalist can criticize the own government. If RT or Xinhua propagandists criticize the Kremlin or the CCP, respectively, they fall out of the window or simply dissappear.
[Edit typo.]
This is a sealion.
It the context of the discussion on RT in this thread, your remarks are blatant whataboutism, exactly parroting RT's and other propagandist's narrative.