674
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Summary

Donald Trump signed an executive order to challenge birthright citizenship, targeting children of undocumented immigrants born in the U.S.

The order argues against the 14th Amendment, which guarantees citizenship for those born on U.S. soil.

It bars federal agencies from recognizing birthright citizenship and imposes a 30-day waiting period for enforcement.

The order is expected to face significant legal challenges, with critics calling it unconstitutional.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Red_October@lemmy.world 66 points 1 year ago

Can't wait for the Right to recognize that if they normalize nullifying constitutional amendments with executive orders, the next Democrat president can just use that to nullify the 2nd Amendment that they're so terribly fond of.

Of course that assumes there will be another election some day.

[-] phughes@lemmy.ca 39 points 1 year ago

next Democrat president

LOL. Fascism is here. There will never be another Democrat president.

[-] futatorius@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago

Nothing lasts forever.

[-] thespcicifcocean@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

that assumes that the Dems will actually do literally anything at all.

[-] gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 1 year ago

Democrat president can just use that to nullify the 2nd Amendment

Can, but won't, because that would be "going low" and "we aren't like them"

You know, like cowardly dipshits

[-] futatorius@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago

Also, only Republicans get a free pass for this kind of shit.

[-] watson387@sopuli.xyz 21 points 1 year ago

Yeah, if they let him start dictating constitutional amendments by executive order there definitely won't be a next election.

[-] futatorius@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago

Expect a state of emergency. Dictators always like that trick.

[-] DomeGuy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

The next election may come after a civil war,.but there will be a next election.

[-] Goodmorningsunshine@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

I don't think that's a problem. Even if they didn't plan to begin their dictatorship now, Biden had immunity and didn't do a goddamn thing with it. Democrats don't do anything.

[-] DomeGuy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

POTUS immunity wasn't a blanket grant of absolute power. It was just the same BS immunity that cops get for what they do as cops.

[-] ubergeek@lemmy.today 4 points 1 year ago

Dunno if you noticed, but cops pretty much have a blanket grant of absolute power...

[-] DomeGuy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Close to it, maybe, but police can't do a whole bunch of things. Like hold you forever without trial, or arbitrarily rape people with no consequences. Or shoot judges whose rulings they don't like

What they get away with is outrageous, but it's not quite "absolute power "

[-] ubergeek@lemmy.today 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Like hold you forever without trial

lol, k. If you live within 100 miles of an international port of entry, your rights are suspended as soon as anyone says "National security".

or arbitrarily rape people with no consequences

Really?

https://www.vice.com/en/article/sarah-everard-cops-sexually-assault-people/

And how infrequently rape is even charged, yes, they can, and do.

Or shoot judges whose rulings they don’t like

Sure they can.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/kentucky-judge-shot-killed-sheriff-video-shown-court-hearing-murder-case/

Cops are the only ones with guns in courthouses!

And if ordered to do so, by the president, nothing to be done.

What they get away with is outrageous, but it’s not quite "absolute power "

For practical purposes, it is. Their only constraint is to not attack the ruling class.

[-] DomeGuy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Are you really trying to round up from "suck" to "tyranny"?

[-] ubergeek@lemmy.today 1 points 1 year ago

If you're not white, or cis, it's already been "tyrrany".

[-] ubergeek@lemmy.today 7 points 1 year ago

the next Democrat president

lol, cute of you to think there will be a "next election".

[-] Red_October@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Of course that assumes there will be another election some day.

Yeah I addressed that.

[-] Critical_Thinker@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Doesn't work because the legal body is republican controlled. Only republican choices are above the law.

this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2025
674 points (99.3% liked)

News

35849 readers
777 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS