370

Proton's biased article on Deepseek (lemmy.ml)

submitted 2 days ago by JOMusic@lemmy.ml to c/opensource@lemmy.ml

160 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Article: https://proton.me/blog/deepseek

Calls it "Deepsneak", failing to make it clear that the reason people love Deepseek is that you can download and it run it securely on any of your own private devices or servers - unlike most of the competing SOTA AIs.

I can't speak for Proton, but the last couple weeks are showing some very clear biases coming out.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] deathbird@mander.xyz 5 points 2 days ago

I don't see the source either. Fair cop.

[-] thingsiplay@beehaw.org 5 points 2 days ago

Thanks for confirmation. I made a top level comment too, because this important information gets lost in the comment hierarchy here.

[-] Hotzilla@sopuli.xyz 2 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Open source is in general wrong term in all of these "open source" LLM's (like LLAMA and R1), the model is shared, but there is no real way of reproducing the model. This is because the training data is never shared.

In my mind open source means that you can reproduce the same binary from source. The models are shared for free,, but not "open".

this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2025

370 points (94.7% liked)

Open Source

32388 readers

655 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Posts must be relevant to the open source ideology
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

Cloak@lemmy.ml

kevincox@lemmy.ml

CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml

Lettuceeatlettuce@lemmy.ml