5
submitted 1 week ago by misk@sopuli.xyz to c/technology@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 0 points 1 week ago
[-] Ulrich@feddit.org 0 points 1 week ago

BlueSky has some novel monetization concepts but yes, I think they will eventually find that those are not sustainable and will introduce ads eventually.

[-] FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

How hard is it to run a platform charging a couple dollars a month so that you don't need to turn into a ghoulish capitalist nightmare? Like, really. If even one of them went the "no ads, ever, just a tiny monthly fee" wouldn't that be better? Wouldn't everyone flock there? Is everyone so dumb that they think these huge sites will run for free?? No.. wait I think I've answered my own question..

[-] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

social media depends on having a critical mass of users, and that's only going to happen with a free model.

Yes. I perhaps should have stated the other way round.

What about "ethical" social network. That's free and ad based if you want that. And the ads are present but less manipulative because the goal is to cover costs not maximise profit.

And then that's a premium option if you want to have no ads and full control of your content feed.

The reason Facebook and co don't offer this is because they apparently make massive amounts from each user ($68). And that only because they engage in whatever ghoulish behaviour get people locked in enough to deliver that

An ethical social network wouldn't have to drive as much per user, because it would publicly limit itself to modest profit. Covering free use with ads presumably possible. Cost of premium being running cost + modest profit seems like it wouldn't be that high surely?

[-] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

theoretically, sure it's possible. but in practice, capitalism will win out in the end. this is pretty much what happened to reddit. first unobtrusive non-targeted ads, then reddit gold... you know the rest.

I think capitalist ghoulishness dominates innovation at the moment. Because massive resources will always be ahead doing new things. But at some point - I hope - a fairly agreeable social network becomes a sort of 'solved problem'. Perhaps some FOSS version becomes available that's not cutting edge but gets the job done. It would lack the sophisticated needed to coerce people and milk their attention, but that's not needed for our purposes.

[-] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The appeal in popular social networks isn't innovation, it's the sheer quantity of other users. You don't need resources just to do new things, you need resources to build and maintain the infrastructure to serve all those users. That's why FOSS social media will always be niche like Lemmy and mastodon.

this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2025
5 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

61749 readers
856 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS