441
submitted 3 days ago by JOMusic@lemmy.ml to c/opensource@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] prenatal_confusion@feddit.org 2 points 2 days ago

Okay let's talk terminology

I meant the useable application as a for example chat bot.

The model itself is useful as far as it enables me to understand the underlying logic of the whole thing right? But without the data and I guess a training period with it I can't use it if I understood it correctly.

If I am right with the above this wouldnt make it useful as in I can reproduce it as a functioning application and I wouldn't call that opensourve in my understanding of the word.

[-] markinov@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 day ago

I don't know much as i ain't knowledgeable in ML and LLM, but i downloaded deepseek R1 7B model (which probably is the weights and architecture) from huggingface and it worked with no "data". So i can say it's reproducible. Now does that make it open source?

this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2025
441 points (98.2% liked)

Open Source

32606 readers
636 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS