212
submitted 22 hours ago by geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml to c/usa@lemmy.ml

During negotiations with the DNC and the Harris campaign, we were repeatedly told by interlocutors that Harris couldn’t meet any of our basic requests (a policy shift from Biden, a Palestinian speaker at the DNC, a statement distinguishing herself from Trump on Israel, or even a meeting with Michigan families who lost loved ones to Israeli bombs) because of AIPAC-aligned politicians like Fetterman, who might take to TV, rile up suburban white and Jewish voters, and fracture the party’s coalition in a swing state.

That political calculus alienated a key voting bloc, although likely not large enough to have shifted the ultimate election outcomes, that should be part of a durable Democratic majority. But few will ever be held accountable for that choice.

A Fetterman staffer condemning Uncommitted for not advocating for Palestinians 'the right way' is like an arsonist scolding the fire department for using the wrong hose.

Source

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Plastic_Ramses@lemmy.world -1 points 8 hours ago

Lmao, what a complete non answer.

[-] liyunxiao@sh.itjust.works 0 points 7 hours ago

It's a complete answer, it's not the one you tried to bait out, but it's a complete answer and it's correct. You can be mad at yourself for not laying a good enough trap to get what you want, or simply for trying to defend one of the worst human beings in one of the worst political parties in the world; but you can't be mad at getting a correct answer.

this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2025
212 points (92.4% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7501 readers
643 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS