955
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago

Yes exactly. It’s a reference to the recording industry’s practice of calling the final version of an album the “master” which gets sent for duplication.

[-] Zink@programming.dev 8 points 1 week ago

In alignment with this, we should not replace the master branch with the main branch, we should replace it with the gold branch.

Every time a PR gets approval and it’s time to merge, I could declare that the code has “gone gold” and I am not doing that right now!

[-] ramjambamalam@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 week ago

Merged -> gone gold

Deployed -> gone platinum

Gone a week without crashing production -> triple platinum

[-] vulpivia@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago

That's just not true. It originally came from Bitkeeper's terminology, which had a master branch and slave branches.

[-] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Not according to pasky, the git contributor who picked the names.

[-] vulpivia@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago

Well, he doesn't seem so sure about it himself. From the same link:

(But as noted in a separate thread, it is possible it stems from bitkeeper's master/slave terminology. I hoped to do some historical research but health emergency in my family delayed that.)

[-] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

He also said:

the impression words form in the reader is more important than their intent

He didn’t intend for the master/slave connotation. He intended for the recording master connotation. Either way, he regrets using the word master and he’s supportive of the change.

this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2025
955 points (96.6% liked)

Programmer Humor

20033 readers
297 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS