966
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 23 points 2 months ago

Yes exactly. It’s a reference to the recording industry’s practice of calling the final version of an album the “master” which gets sent for duplication.

[-] Zink@programming.dev 9 points 2 months ago

In alignment with this, we should not replace the master branch with the main branch, we should replace it with the gold branch.

Every time a PR gets approval and it’s time to merge, I could declare that the code has “gone gold” and I am not doing that right now!

[-] ramjambamalam@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 months ago

Merged -> gone gold

Deployed -> gone platinum

Gone a week without crashing production -> triple platinum

[-] vulpivia@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 months ago

That's just not true. It originally came from Bitkeeper's terminology, which had a master branch and slave branches.

[-] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Not according to pasky, the git contributor who picked the names.

[-] vulpivia@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 months ago

Well, he doesn't seem so sure about it himself. From the same link:

(But as noted in a separate thread, it is possible it stems from bitkeeper's master/slave terminology. I hoped to do some historical research but health emergency in my family delayed that.)

[-] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

He also said:

the impression words form in the reader is more important than their intent

He didn’t intend for the master/slave connotation. He intended for the recording master connotation. Either way, he regrets using the word master and he’s supportive of the change.

this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2025
966 points (96.5% liked)

Programmer Humor

22616 readers
1139 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS