Why hard paywalls is not blocked on Lemmy? (ponder.cat)

submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by Cat@ponder.cat to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

11 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I started to notice some people posting NYT, Bloomberg or other websites with hard paywalls, that leads to people in the comments that are unable to read the article to discuess the headline without any analysis and some times spreading misinformation, which cannot be countered by the article, due to the paywall.

Which bring me to this: Why does no one thought about blocking hard paywalled articles for the sake of quality of discussion?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 week ago

Because like it or not, actually paying for stuff is the only way to save journalism and by extension our democracies.

Paying for things does not prevent enshitification.

[-] truthfultemporarily@feddit.org 17 points 1 week ago

But not paying for it almost guarantees it.

this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2025

23 points (78.0% liked)

Asklemmy

45236 readers

1066 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS