88
submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net

One discipline that has been targeted more specifically is climate science. President Trump has long downplayed the threats from human-caused global warming. At the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, staff members have been ordered to comb their research awards for terms including “climate science,” “climate crisis,” “clean energy” and “pollution.”

Aurora Roth is finishing her doctoral studies at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography at the University of California, San Diego, and preparing to apply for jobs. Instead, she said, “I am wondering what institutions will even exist in a year.”

She and other scientists could figure out how to reword their funding applications to avoid mentioning climate change, Ms. Roth said. But “feeling attacked just on the basis of doing science in the world? That’s a hard thing to sit with,” she said.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] wirebeads@lemmy.ca 15 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Canada should invite these scientists here to fund and continue their research.

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 8 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Absolutely. With a bit of investment this is an opportunity for any other country to poach some of the world's best scientists. And Canada has geographical and cultural advantages in that competition. It would be a good investment for the long term.

this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2025
88 points (98.9% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5792 readers
463 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS