How good is kdenlive these days? (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by bpt11@sh.itjust.works to c/opensource@lemmy.ml

25 comments fedilink hide all child comments

When i try to find reviews or people talking about Kdenlive on places like YouTube, I mostly find things that are 2-5 years old at this point and just seem relatively outdated. Does it have an active community of users? Is it worth using in 2025? I think it seems really promising but i haven't given it a shot yet.

Edit: up to this point I've been a user of premier pro and more recently DaVinci resolve

Another edit for further context: I wouldn't say I'm a "professional editor" but I'm not just making simple cuts either. I make video essays on YouTube and my style is pretty edit heavy. Lots of text, sometimes I'll have like 10 things on screen at once, etc

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] m4m4m4m4@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I edited several videos for work precisely 2-5 years ago and it was really good. That surprised me in the good sense because last time I tried it before that was like in 2010 and was rather funky, but so was my crappy laptop. And there's been a while since that and since KDE brought it to attention and the fundraising and you name it and it seems it has improven even more. Maybe with time it can be another famous representative from KDE targeted towards content creation as now it is Krita.

That being said, I just can't take any "review" from a "normie" about FOSS stuff seriously because most of the time they come from a propietary software mindset.

Take for example reviews about Inkscape or GIMP and you'll find most of them mentioning "they're not as usable as Photoshop/Illustrator". So people expect any alternative to work exactly as their non-foss counterpart, which is absolutely ridiculous.

[-] vort3@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 days ago

I'd say there's nothing ridiculous in expecting FOSS thing to be as good as non FOSS, both are made by human after all, yes more work is done by paid developers than by enthusiasts, but there's nothing impossible about FOSS software being as good as non FOSS.

What's ridiculous is that people expect one software to behave the same as other software when the FOSS software does not imply in any way that it is a clone of a proprietary software and that it strives to behave the same way / be a direct replacemen. Like, yes, Inkscape is a great vector editor, but noone says it's an Illustrator clone. You can ditch Illustrator and use Inkscape, but it isn't a direct replacement, stuff will be different.

There are "free clones", like double Commander is a clone of Total Commander, and in this case it is valid to expect one to behave exactly like another.

[-] m4m4m4m4@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

What's ridiculous is that people expect one software to behave the same as other software when the FOSS software does not imply in any way that it is a clone of a proprietary software

Well, that was exactly my point.