25
submitted 4 months ago by woelkchen@lemmy.world to c/science@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] deadcatbounce@reddthat.com -1 points 4 months ago

You know in the current climate that if there was ever a custody dispute, neither father would get custody or access.

Just sayin'.

[-] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Systemic oppression sucks, doesn't it.

[-] deadcatbounce@reddthat.com 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Maybe in your country.

The UK has had three female PMs (?) and more female party leaders beginning almost fifty years ago.

We've also had multiple female heads of state (Mary I in 1553; Elizabeth I in 1559 etc ). You might argue that those are an accident of birth, but I might remind you that England has never been shy about removing less than adequate heads of state.

Tell me about your leaders who you say subjugate women.

[-] ikidd@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Don't forget that the British monarch was a woman for 134 years of the last 200.

[-] deadcatbounce@reddthat.com 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Yeah, thought I'd covered that.

Female monarchs weren't always British. 1707 was the Inception of Great Britain. Corrections welcome, my history isn't always ideal.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2025
25 points (80.5% liked)

science

19914 readers
380 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS