25
submitted 4 months ago by woelkchen@lemmy.world to c/science@lemmy.world
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Dasus@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

Issues remain

This process is still not without problems. As the study’s authors acknowledge, the mice created by this process are not fertile, and can only be reproduced through cloning.

Additionally, more than half of the mice born to two fathers either do not survive, die young, fail to mature properly, or fail to reach adulthood.

In a previous study from 2018, the same research team had shown that mice born to two mothers were fertile and survived longer than those born to two fathers, all of whom died shortly after birth. In their new study, published last month, the results have improved, though only partially.

As I suspected, XY + XY is way worse than XX + XX. Former isn't even fertile. Neither really work, but it's promising research.

Science marches forwards.

tldr Same-sex moms might be able to have children sooner than same-sex dads.

[-] SolidShake@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago
[-] Lemminary@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago
[-] rayquetzalcoatl@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I know how to reproduce with one father, but unfortunately he's my wife's father and if she ever finds out we've been trying for a baby she'll kill me

[-] deadcatbounce@reddthat.com -1 points 4 months ago

You know in the current climate that if there was ever a custody dispute, neither father would get custody or access.

Just sayin'.

[-] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Systemic oppression sucks, doesn't it.

[-] deadcatbounce@reddthat.com 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Maybe in your country.

The UK has had three female PMs (?) and more female party leaders beginning almost fifty years ago.

We've also had multiple female heads of state (Mary I in 1553; Elizabeth I in 1559 etc ). You might argue that those are an accident of birth, but I might remind you that England has never been shy about removing less than adequate heads of state.

Tell me about your leaders who you say subjugate women.

[-] ikidd@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Don't forget that the British monarch was a woman for 134 years of the last 200.

[-] deadcatbounce@reddthat.com 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Yeah, thought I'd covered that.

Female monarchs weren't always British. 1707 was the Inception of Great Britain. Corrections welcome, my history isn't always ideal.

this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2025
25 points (80.5% liked)

science

19954 readers
71 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS