32
submitted 3 days ago by dessalines@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] davel@lemmy.ml 12 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Not to paint Sachs as a perfect saint, but Naomi Klein really oversold his villainry in her book. Sachs was not the architect of shock therapy, which is a neoliberal economics project in direct opposition to Sach’s Keynesian economics school. As capitalist positions go, Keynesianism is comparatively good. He talked about it a little last year on Breaking Points. I tend to think that he was dropped into the former Warsaw Pact states when he was young, idealistic, and largely ignorant of US neocolonialism.

[-] TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee -4 points 3 days ago

I find it interesting that people here are falling over themselves to defend a capitalist economist. Is supporting Russian nationalism so important that we now defend a participant in the destruction of the Soviet system?

[-] davel@lemmy.ml 9 points 3 days ago

You’re arguing with straw men. I’m not defending capitalism nor the destruction of the Soviet Union. Nobody is confusing Sachs for a comrade. I said, “as capitalist positions go.” There’s a difference between Keynesianism and neocolonial asset stripping of the commons.

[-] TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee -2 points 3 days ago

You’re arguing with straw men. I’m not defending capitalism

I claimed you were defending a capitalist economist, which you are.

My original statement was to take anything he said with a grain of salt and that he pioneered what would one day be labeled as shock therapy.

Which people then claimed he didn't do, based on his own claims.

this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2025
32 points (84.8% liked)

World News

33623 readers
703 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS