519
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by Confidant6198@lemmy.ml to c/usa@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 12 points 3 days ago

Probably because two political parties isn't enough to truly represent the population.

People shit talk non voters, but these are people who found no representation in the two party system. We can change this. We can have more then two political parties. To think otherwise is to think inside the world's smallest box.

[-] AES_Enjoyer@reddthat.com 3 points 2 days ago

Countries with more parties such as those in Western Europe are also electing fascists. The answer doesn't lie in more parties. China has a majority party and it doesn't get people doing the Sieg Heil

[-] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago

Duverger's Law says that as long as we have this system of voting, we're going to have two, and only two, major parties. It has changed once in history: when the Republicans replaced the Whigs. So, that's what you're looking at: either change the system of voting or replace one of the two parties.

[-] Krono@lemmy.today 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The major political parties may have only changed names once, but the most common stance in modern political science is that we are in the 6th political party alignment in US history.

  • Centralization 1796-1824
  • Jacksonians 1828-1852
  • Republicans 1856-1892
  • Progressives 1898-1928
  • New Dealers 1932-1972
  • Neoliberalism 1980-Present
this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2025
519 points (77.3% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7610 readers
710 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS