view the rest of the comments
Firefox
The latest news and developments on Firefox and Mozilla, a global non-profit that strives to promote openness, innovation and opportunity on the web.
You can subscribe to this community from any Kbin or Lemmy instance:
Related
- Firefox Customs: !FirefoxCSS@fedia.io
- Thunderbird: !Thunderbird@fedia.io
Rules
While we are not an official Mozilla community, we have adopted the Mozilla Community Participation Guidelines as far as it can be applied to a bin.
Rules
-
Always be civil and respectful
Don't be toxic, hostile, or a troll, especially towards Mozilla employees. This includes gratuitous use of profanity. -
Don't be a bigot
No form of bigotry will be tolerated. -
Don't post security compromising suggestions
If you do, include an obvious and clear warning. -
Don't post conspiracy theories
Especially ones about nefarious intentions or funding. If you're concerned: Ask. Please don’t fuel conspiracy thinking here. Don’t try to spread FUD, especially against reliable privacy-enhancing software. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Show credible sources. -
Don't accuse others of shilling
Send honest concerns to the moderators and/or admins, and we will investigate. -
Do not remove your help posts after they receive replies
Half the point of asking questions in a public sub is so that everyone can benefit from the answers—which is impossible if you go deleting everything behind yourself once you've gotten yours.
In what way? I switched to LibreWolf a few months ago and haven't noticed anything. But admittedly I'm not asking much of it.
Say there's a Zero-day exploit that gets found. LibreWolf is going to rely on Firefox to patch it, they aren't going to have the resources and manpower to patch it themselves. That means they will always be behind.
Forks of the main project almost always lag behind the main project unless they somehow spin off and put more money/manpower into the project than the original author; and LibreWolf sure isn't doing that.
Additionally, depending on how they plan to operate - their fork could slowly drift away from the original firefox fork, meaning more and more of their codebase has to be maintained by their team with respect to security. This means more potential for their own unique security flaws.
Mozilla/Firefox isn't selling your data. This habit of Lemmy users to freak out and jump ship over every little thing is just silly.
.so I should just switch back?
Only if you're paranoid about security. It should be fine, generally.
I'm not, but also not sure what the benefit of LibreFox really is.
@kitnaht@lemmy.world
@DavidBHimself@firefish.city @can@sh.itjust.works
the question is how do we get a fork enough developers that they can support themselves independantly