113
submitted 5 months ago by Sunshine@lemmy.ca to c/linux@programming.dev
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] dpflug@kbin.earth 7 points 5 months ago

He explained that IRQ suspension enhances network performance while maintaining low latency during low-traffic conditions by reducing unnecessary CPU interruptions during high-traffic periods.

Am I overtired or is this nonsense?

[-] Ephera@lemmy.ml 16 points 5 months ago

I think, you have to read it like this:

He explained that IRQ suspension enhances network performance ... by reducing unnecessary CPU interruptions during high-traffic periods. It also maintains low latency during low-traffic conditions.

[-] dpflug@kbin.earth 5 points 5 months ago

See, that makes sense. You're probably right. They didn't paren their parenthetical.

[-] PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

He explained that IRQ suspension enhances network performance, while maintaining low latency during low-traffic conditions. It accomplishes this by reducing unnecessary CPU interruptions during high-traffic periods.

Maybe that makes more sense? The original was definitely a run-on sentence, and needed some punctuation.

this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2025
113 points (98.3% liked)

Linux

8785 readers
621 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS