64
Tim Walz says he and Harris were too ‘safe’ during 2024 presidential campaign
(www.theguardian.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2025
64 points (100.0% liked)
Politics
10289 readers
145 users here now
In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.
Guidelines for submissions:
- Where possible, post the original source of information.
- If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
- Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
- Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
- Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
- Social media should be a source of last resort.
These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Yeah. I'm honestly not really sure why I posted this. I guess it was a little interesting, but between Democratic politicians who mostly just want campaign contributions, consultants who are sure that if the candidates keep channeling Reagan they'll start winning elections, and media which is absolutely committed to telling anyone who will listen that Trump is stronger on the economy and Biden never did anything important, it hardly matters what "strategy" Harris and Walz came out with. The problems go about a thousand miles deeper than "we should have had more town halls."
That they’re admitting they fucked up in any way other than “ we should have run a primary” or the BS excuse of “we weren’t mean enough to trans people” is news in it’s own right.
You're delusional if you think anyone would've won thy primary other than Biden or Harris
A primary would have been suicidal. Wow, figure it out.