750

Shouldn't be a issue since landlords never lie to keep deposits right?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] lka1988@sh.itjust.works 69 points 1 day ago

As someone who is likely going to be stuck renting for the foreseeable future, I agree. I'll happily pay my deposit to some sort of escrow that the landlord has zero access to until it's proven by a neutral third party, with no financial interest in the property, who has seen the property before and after renting.

[-] alkbch@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 day ago

Who’s going to pay this neutral third party to come see the property twice and allocate the deposit between the tenant and landlord?

[-] bent@lemm.ee 22 points 1 day ago

Either the landlord or a split between the parties

[-] alkbch@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 day ago

A split between the parties might help avoid conflict of interests

[-] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Where I live it’s up to the landlord to dispute the return of the government-held bond and prove their case to the tribunal. If they do not dispute within two weeks after the tenant claims it, or are unsuccessful in proving damage, the government automatically releases the bond back to the tenant.

load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2025
750 points (98.6% liked)

Memes

48486 readers
4457 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS