38
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SculptusPoe@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago

That's a trash article, and Antarctica is the last place anyone should worry about cruises going unless they are chopping up penguins for bird-brunch or something.

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 9 points 7 months ago

The problem is not only the cruise itself, but also all the energy spent getting the people and supplies to run the cruise. Plus the ecosystem is especially fragile, and the Antarctic glaciers are melting too fast as it is, calving icebergs which further damage the environment.

[-] iopq@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

It's no more energy than going on a Pacific cruise

Ships are actually very energy efficient, those people probably would use more gasoline during their daily commute since each of them would drive a car or take a cab. If they went on a plane somewhere for vacation, it would use a lot more fuel

[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

Don’t cruise ships use bunker fuel?

this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2025
38 points (76.4% liked)

science

22070 readers
12 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS