38
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SculptusPoe@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

That's a trash article, and Antarctica is the last place anyone should worry about cruises going unless they are chopping up penguins for bird-brunch or something.

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

The problem is not only the cruise itself, but also all the energy spent getting the people and supplies to run the cruise. Plus the ecosystem is especially fragile, and the Antarctic glaciers are melting too fast as it is, calving icebergs which further damage the environment.

[-] iopq@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's no more energy than going on a Pacific cruise

Ships are actually very energy efficient, those people probably would use more gasoline during their daily commute since each of them would drive a car or take a cab. If they went on a plane somewhere for vacation, it would use a lot more fuel

[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Don’t cruise ships use bunker fuel?

this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2025
38 points (76.4% liked)

science

27301 readers
127 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

dart board;; science bs

rule #1: be kind

lemmy.world rules

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS