38
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 46 points 4 months ago

I don't see what sex has to do with it. There are many more non-sex cruises doing the same thing.

[-] dditty@lemm.ee 3 points 4 months ago

Imo, the point is just that the juxtaposition of sex cruises to visit the melting antarctic shelves is incongruous

[-] Captainautism@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 4 months ago

Maybe they’ll provide lube.

[-] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 22 points 4 months ago

Sex cruises to where? The complaints of shrinkage will be legendary.

[-] Captainautism@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 4 months ago
[-] SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago

Uh, that’s a whoosh, cap’n!

[-] cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 4 months ago

I didn’t have that one on my bingo card

[-] kungen@feddit.nu 16 points 4 months ago

Clever advertisement or what?

[-] Hayduke@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

"... full-scale bonkathon"

I approve of this

[-] SculptusPoe@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

That's a trash article, and Antarctica is the last place anyone should worry about cruises going unless they are chopping up penguins for bird-brunch or something.

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 9 points 4 months ago

The problem is not only the cruise itself, but also all the energy spent getting the people and supplies to run the cruise. Plus the ecosystem is especially fragile, and the Antarctic glaciers are melting too fast as it is, calving icebergs which further damage the environment.

[-] iopq@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

It's no more energy than going on a Pacific cruise

Ships are actually very energy efficient, those people probably would use more gasoline during their daily commute since each of them would drive a car or take a cab. If they went on a plane somewhere for vacation, it would use a lot more fuel

[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Don’t cruise ships use bunker fuel?

[-] djsoren19@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 4 months ago

If we're destroying the planet anyway, at least this is a more fun reason to do it.

[-] venusaur@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

What’s more natural than sex?

[-] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

so it'll be herpes that kills off the last few penguins? didn't have that on my bingo card...

[-] venusaur@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

You can die from herpes? Probably more likely to die from beastiality rape.

[-] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Probably more likely to die from beastiality rape.

I was thinking cruise ship waste but uh.... yeah.... that'll probably fuck up a penguin

[-] Kitathalla@lemy.lol 1 points 4 months ago

As a matter of fact, yes. I was talking to a vet at a friend's wedding, and he casually mentioned that working with simians is a dangerous field for many reasons that you wouldn't think of, like their herpesvirus strains killing us.

[-] venusaur@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Luckily it says it’s extremely rare

[-] Kitathalla@lemy.lol 1 points 4 months ago

Well, yeah. The only way to get it is from contact with an infected monkey, or something that has recently contacted them, like a needle.

[-] venusaur@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

With no end to deforestation in sight, and fixing the housing crisis, monkeys have been sharing crack houses with humans

this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2025
38 points (76.4% liked)

science

20433 readers
44 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS