1010
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] dxdydz@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Nobody used the word subjective. What are you on about?

[-] Makeshift@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 hours ago

Seems my brain autofilled the concept in, with the post image being confused why someone would consider opposing morals to their own as terrible.

“Moralality is subjective” is a common way to say “Well my morals are different than yours and that’s okay” to justify immoral behavior. With the image being confused about students acknowledging morals being culturally formed, while not entertaining debate on their own morals.

Yes, morals are a subjective thing that only exist with a mind to perceive them.

That doesn’t mean there aren’t right or wrong morals. That doesn’t mean anyone should entertain debate over the morality of whether, say for example, white supremacy is “just an opinion, bro”. There’s nothing confusing about acknowledging that it’s a mindset caused by culture, and also viewing it as a “moral monstrosity”.

… I’m also posting these ramblings half asleep.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

So you legitimately don't recognize the screenshot as being fundamentally based around the issues of subjectivity and objectivity?

I mean.. what are you on about?

[-] dxdydz@slrpnk.net -2 points 2 days ago

I think you should read more carefully in the future, but this time I’ll explain it to you: The OP used the word relative. The reply went into a discussion about how the word subjective has a narrow meaning in philosophy that isn’t the same as the common usage. The OP was not discussing subjectivity in the sense of the reply, nor did it use the word subjective.

[-] robador51@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Probably in relation to the use of 'relative', I guess a synonym for subjective?

(Edit) I thought is was an interesting comment btw

[-] dxdydz@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 days ago

Yeah, I guess. Maybe they misread the OP. I agree that it was interesting, though completely irrelevant to the statement in the OP.

this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2025
1010 points (99.1% liked)

People Twitter

6467 readers
2644 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS