Is "The Hill" going to be labelled as a Russian asset now? The article does indeed contain a shocking amount of truth, and completely contradicts the western narrative for the last 3 years.
I think I've already seen libs dismissing The Hill as Russian propaganda. Basically any reporting that runs contrary to the propaganda they've been guzzling for the past three years is immediately dismissed.
Is "The Hill" going to be labelled as a Russian asset now? The article does indeed contain a shocking amount of truth, and completely contradicts the western narrative for the last 3 years.
I think I've already seen libs dismissing The Hill as Russian propaganda. Basically any reporting that runs contrary to the propaganda they've been guzzling for the past three years is immediately dismissed.