271
submitted 2 weeks ago by Saleh@feddit.org to c/world@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

Israel is a fascist apartheid state committing genocide. Police violently cracking down on anti-israel / anti-zionist speech is also fascist. You are conflating anti-zionism with anti-semitism, which is genuine anti-semitism. Anti-zionism calls for the end to genocide and for Palestinians emancipation.

Zionism is about Settler Colonialism and Ethnic Cleansing of native Palestinians, it is not reflective of Judaism nor is it representative of Jewish people. Anti-zionism is not anti-semitism. The conflation of the two is genuinely antisemitic, as it falsely attributes the actions of Israel to all Jewish people.

Zionism is anti-Semitic at it's core, it other-izes Jewish people, and justifies the violent settler colonialim of Israel as in the defense of all Jewish people, which only serves to further fuel genuine Antisemitism at the expense of Jewish people globally. Zionism is also an inherently fascist ideology. The ethnic cleansing of the native people of Palestine has always been fundamental since it's inception as a colonialist movement.

Adi Callai, an Israeli, does a great analysis of how Antisemitism has been weaponized by Zionism during its history.

[-] jimmy90@lemmy.world -3 points 2 weeks ago

depends on the kind of anti-zionism

"destroy israel" for example is genocidal

palestinians and israeli's have been trying to genocide eachother for about a hundred years

[-] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

palestinians and israeli's have been trying to genocide eachother for about a hundred years

That's completely false and a common hasbara talking point to justify the ethnic cleansing of Palestine.

The Concept of Transfer in Zionist Political Thought goes back to 1882

Zionism’s aims in Palestine, its deeply-held conviction that the Land of Israel belonged exclusively to the Jewish people as a whole, and the idea of Palestine’s “civilizational barrenness" or “emptiness” against the background of European imperialist ideologies all converged in the logical conclusion that the native population should make way for thenewcomers.

The idea that the Palestinian Arabs must find a place for themselves elsewhere was articulated early on. Indeed, the founder of the movement, Theodor Herzl, provided an early reference to transfer even before he formally outlined his theory of Zionist rebirth in his Judenstat.

An 1895 entry in his diary provides in embryonic form many of the elements that were to be demonstrated repeatedly in the Zionist quest for solutions to the “Arab problem ”-the idea of dealing with state governments over the heads of the indigenous population, Jewish acquisition of property that would be inalienable, “Hebrew Land" and “Hebrew Labor,” and the removal of the native population.

Partition

The Zionists were tireless in their efforts to shape the Commission's proposals, meeting not only with the Com­ mission members themselves, but with statesmen, cabinet ministers, members of parliament, and senior officials at the Foreign and Colonial Office with whom the Commission members were likely to consult before formulating their recommendations.15 At these meetings the idea of a popu­lation transfer was promoted in conjunction with the parti­tion of the country, the partition idea apparently was first suggested by a member of the Commission itself. Professor Reginald Coupland, during a private meeting with Weizmann in Palestine. The prospect of official British recognition- hitherto steadfastly denied-of Jewish sovereignty and state­ hood, even in only part of Palestine, represented a tremen­ dous, and at that stage unhoped for, advance for the Zionist movement. Given the demographic realities at the time, whatever boundaries might be devised for partition would inevitably result in large numbers of Arabs and even greater expanses of Arab-owned land becoming part of whatever Jewish state would be carved out. Thus, the notion of transfer was a natural concommitant to the partition idea. Evidence sug­ gests that the proposal of Arab transfer that was ultimately made by the Royal Commission originated from, and had been secretly conveyed by, top Jewish Agency leaders, including Ben-Gurion, Shertok, and weizmann. As early as the Jewish Agency Executive meeting in October, Ben- Gurion had indicated his intention to raise the issue: “if the Peel Commission and the London government accept [the idea of transfer to Transjordan], we will remove the land problem from the agenda.’

  • Simha Flapan - The Birth of Israel Myths and Realities

Morris asserted that the onset of the fighting between Israel and the Arab armies that entered the country on the day the British Mandate ended, May 15, 1948, was the main reason for what he called the “Birth of the Palestinian refugee problem.” I have argued that it was not the war itself, since half of those who became refugees—hundreds of thousands of Palestinians—had been expelled before it had even commenced. Moreover, I claimed that the war was initiated by Israel in order to secure the historical opportunity to expel the Palestinians.19 The idea that the Palestinians left voluntarily is not the only false assumption associated with the 1948 war. There are three others that are often aired to explain away the events of that year. The first is that the Palestinians are to be blamed for what happened to them since they rejected the UN partition plan of November 1947. This allegation ignores the colonialist nature of the Zionist movement. What is clear is that the ethnic cleansing of the Palestinians can in no way be justified as a “punishment” for their rejecting a UN peace plan that was devised without any consultation with the Palestinians themselves.

  • Ilan Pappe - Ten Myths About Israel - Ch 5

Under Occupation

Hamas began twenty years into the occupation during the first Intifada, with the goal of ending the occupation. Collective punishment has been a deliberate Israeli tactic for decades with the Dahiya doctrine. Violence such as suicide bombings and rockets escalated in response to Israeli enforcement of the occupation and apartheid.

Hamas 1988 Charter and Revised 2017 Charter

The 1988 Charter, which is certainly unreasonable in its fundamentalism with Sharia Law and is antisemitic, does not call for the extermination of all Jewish People. Hamas wants an end to Israel as an Apartheid State, not an extermination of all Israelis. Under Ahmed Yassin in the 1990's, truces were offered in exchange for Israeli to withdrawal from Gaza and the West Bank to the 1967 borders. The 2017 Revised charter explicitly accepts a Two-State Solution of the 1967 Borders. Check Article 7 and 13 of the 1988 Charter to see yourself, compare it to Article 20 and 24-26 in the revised charter.

The slogan From the River to the Sea is about Palestinian liberation that started in the 60s by the PLO for a democratic secular state, not Genocide. The Syrian leader Hafez al-Assad in 1966 maybe, but he's not Palestinian.

History of Hamas supported by Netanyahu since 2012

[-] jimmy90@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

morris doesn't say that palestine belongs to the jews, he quite clearly states lots of people have lived there over the years mostly under muslim empires but also a jewish country that was ethnically cleansed by the romans

oh and hamas started with the aim of destroying israel. genocide

[-] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

Like I said, he is a Zionist who justifies the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians, as you can clearly see in both the previous quote and the one I just sent to your other comment.

oh and hamas started with the aim of destroying israel. genocide

Again, as I pointed out in the last section of the previous reply, "destroying Israel" has always meant ending the Apartheid and Settler Colonialist Occupation of Zionism. It has never meant the Genocide of Jewish people nor Israelis. That is complete projection from the mentality of the occupiers who have been ethnically cleansing Palestinians for more than 76 years.

[-] jimmy90@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

lol from the Hamas Covenant 1988

Israel will exist and will continue to exist until Islam will obliterate it, just as it obliterated others before it

destroy and obliterate could easily be interpreted as defensive, progressive action, let's all just get along, right?

[-] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

JFC, that's discussed at length in the section you didn't read twice

[-] jimmy90@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago
[-] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago
[-] jimmy90@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

so they took the obliteration thing out and accepted the 1967 borders in 2017

congratulations, only 50 years too late, after 50 years of attacks

and then went mental in 2023

these guys really have peace in mind

[-] jimmy90@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

they completely reject the israeli state and expect palestine to cover the whole land

that isn't happening

no peace as usual

[-] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

The Israeli state is and has always been about the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians. Of course Palestinians aren't going to accept being ethnically cleansed from their homes. Palestinians want emancipation and equal rights. Israel has never wanted peace. You're clearly a Zionist, which is fascist, since you keep repeating their propaganda even in the face of evidence that debunks it completely.

Settlements and Occupation

Israel justifies the settlements and military bases in the West Bank in the name of Security. However, the reality of the settlements on-the-ground has been the cause of violent resistance and a significant obstacle to peace, as it has been for decades.

This type of settlement, where the native population gets 'Transferred' to make room for the settlers, is a long standing practice.

The mass ethnic cleansing campaign of 1948:

Further, declassified Israeli documents show that the Occupation of the West Bank and Gaza Strip were deliberately planned before being executed in 1967:

While the peace process was exploited to continue de-facto annexation of the West Bank via Settlements

The settlements are maintained through a violent apartheid that routinely employs violence towards Palestinians and denies human rights like water access, civil rights, etc. This kind of control gives rise to violent resistance to the Apartheid occupation, jeopardizing the safety of Israeli civilians.

The apartheid regime is based on organized, systemic violence against Palestinians, which is carried out by numerous agents: the government, the military, the Civil Administration, the Supreme Court, the Israel Police, the Israel Security Agency, the Israel Prison Service, the Israel Nature and Parks Authority, and others. Settlers are another item on this list, and the state incorporates their violence into its own official acts of violence. Settler violence sometimes precedes instances of official violence by Israeli authorities, and at other times is incorporated into them. Like state violence, settler violence is organized, institutionalized, well-equipped and implemented in order to achieve a defined strategic goal.

Apartheid Evidence

Amnesty Report

Human Rights Watch Report

B'TSelem Report with quick Explainer

Visualizing the Ethnic Cleansing

[-] jimmy90@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

your brain will never be able to conceive of peace because anyone that disagrees with you is immediately a nazi

and what would you do with your day without the struggle, comrade

[-] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

Walk like a duck, quack like a duck. There is no way to justify the Fascism that is Occupation, Apartheid, and Genocide that isn't fascist.

[-] jimmy90@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

and how do you justify the international terrorism, suicide bombings, rocket attacks?

what word is burned into your brain for that?

[-] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

I don't justify it. I understand that it comes from having no options available in the face of extermination. You have no conception of anti-colonial violence. I understand that to end anti-colonial violence requires an end to the colonial violence.

I could much more easily call Israel a terrorist state, and by looking at cases of actual acts of terror, it's clear that Israel does magnitudes more. But while acknowledging acts of terrorism is important, giving the label of terrorist to an entire group is not really useful. It's mostly use to de-legitimize acts of resistance against colonialism and occupations. Such is the case with Ireland, Vietnam, Algeria, South Africa, and many more.

Both the Occupier and the Occupied can and do use acts of terrorism to further their aims, but the aims are diametrically opposed. The aim of the occupier is to continue the occupation, that requires violence to maintain, and ethnic cleansing. The aim of the occupied is to end the occupation, by any means possible, and gain emancipation. We see that one is a reaction to the other, Israel's perpetual violence towards native peoples is the underlying cause of these conflicts. Solutions to ending the violence of anti-colonialism can only come from ending the underlying violence of the colonialism.

We see that permanent occupation develops into an Apartheid, as the settlers / occupiers have rights upheld by the State and Military, while the natives / occupied have no rights and subjected to violence from both the Settlers and Military. The State, who holds the monopoly on power, uses terrorism to suppress resistance to the occupation in order to maintain it. The occupied, having no power, uses terrorism as a means to resist the occupation.

Israel has no interest in peace, it has interest in land grabbing, which is in complete opposition to peace. This is fundamental to Zionism. Which is why an end to Zionism and a regime change, where a Secular Bi-National One-State that gives equal rights to Palestinians and Israelis is the only way for the conflict to really end. Not only with Palestinian resistance, but with all resistance groups that were created by Israeli occupation.

The existence of Hamas, and any armed resistance movement, is directly due to the decades of violence experienced daily under the permanent occupation, the Apartheid State, of Israel. It's impossible to understand their existence if you don't understand the lived experience and material conditions they are forced to live under. There is no such thing as a perfect victim when it comes to anti-Colonialist resistance, not for the Vietcong, the IRA, or the ANC either. Can you condemn the violence of the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising in the same way as the violence of the Warsaw Ghetto?

In the Shadow of the Holocaust by Masha Gessen, the situation in Gaza is compared to the Warsaw Ghettos. The comparison was also made by a Palestinian poet who was later killed by an Israeli airstrike. Adi Callai has also written on the parallels in his article The Gaza Ghetto Uprising and expanded upon in his corresponding video

Adi Callai has also done a great analysis of how Antisemitism has been weaponized by Zionism during its history, as well as an analysis of Franz Fanon and Identity Politics in the context of Colonialism and Anti-colonialism.

Watch those videos before you respond

[-] jimmy90@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

you really can't get it into your head that the jews lived there for thousands of years and still lived there at the beginning of this century

you're so antisemitic

they are not colonisers

[-] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

you really can't get it into your head that the jews lived there for thousands of years and still lived there at the beginning of this century you're so antisemitic

I, nor Palestinians have any problems with Jewish people living in Palestine. You continue to conflate Jewish people in general with Zionists. The problem is with the Settler Colonialism, the cornerstone of Zionism. Read the book by Nur Masalha, which details the history of Palestine in the past 4000 years.

they are not colonisers

You can't be fucking serious. Zionism was explicitly started as a settler Colonialist project. It began with settlements that displaced Palestinians, it has never stopped settling and displacing Palestinians, neither within Israel prior to 1967 or the West Bank after 1967. Which you would have picked up if you engaged with the damn sources instead of acting confidently incorrect because you're terrified that you may be wrong.

[-] jimmy90@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

come now you can't fool me

it's obvious that anyone against your palestinian cause immediately becomes a zionist and genocider

including surely all the jews living in palestine in the early 20th century and any jew or other human even vaguely supporting them including myself

how can a settler colonialist project be started by natives

the problem is you're antisemitic and pro the genicidal philospphy that the arabs have had for over 100 years

it's only now that the attacks on israel have made the situation so bad that peace is even considered

[-] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Read the books and watch the videos if you're so interested. I'm done talking with you. You ignore every source provided. You are either a troll or so willfully ignorant that you can't bring yourself to take a serious look at the sources that contradict your personal world view.

[-] jimmy90@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

i'm confident the neither of us trust each-others sources

the only way forward to peace is to agree on a shared reality of the region's history and work from there

i hope you can deprogram your fundamentalist left-wing fantasies soon

best of luck

[-] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

You're one source is Benny Morris, which I've already read and cross referenced with numerous other historians. You haven't read a single book I mentioned. Don't trust, verify. If you're so confident, go ahead and try to prove yourself wrong. It's all readily available, you can find all the books mentioned on Anna's Archive for free, but you won't.

[-] jimmy90@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

you're very keen on sources i notice, i guess it lends itself to a air of arcane legitimacy

but sources don't matter to the obvious paradox i've been highlighting that you've studiously been ignoring

i think the jews are native to the land of palestine whereas you think they are zionist colonial genocidal invaders

by the way when egypt jordan et al invaded were they being arabic colonial empirical invaders or just good buddies to their arab chums?

[-] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

Go read Expulsion of the Palestinians The Concept of "Transfer" in Zionist Political Thought 1882-1948 by Nur Masalha Chapter 1

[-] jimmy90@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago

so you agree that jews are indigenous to palestine

[-] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago
[-] jimmy90@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago

when you've trained to believe something for so long and it starts to fracture it must be a little unsettling

[-] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

Nice projection. Read it or stop talking to me

[-] jimmy90@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago

I wasn't so much talking to you as talking through you

I mean you've already admitted it's a civil war and not colonial

By the way did you copy and paste the info dumps from previous discussions or are they prepared for you

[-] jimmy90@lemmy.world -4 points 2 weeks ago

here's a video on the history of palestine, you can decide for yourself if the jews have a right to live in palestine, have a right to a state in palestine, have a right to return to palestine and how long the conflict has been going on

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wv8F4NLr4E0

[-] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Benny Morris is a Zionist who justifies and supports the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians. If you are genuinely interested in the full story, you should at the least read the works of anti-zionist Historians as well

Gaza Infographics

Historian Works on the History

Documentaries

A shocking insight into Israel's Apartheid | Roadmap to Apartheid | Full Film

Palestine 101 with Abby Martin

Life in Occupied PALESTINE by Anna Baltzer

How Israeli Apartheid Destroyed My Hometown

The Gaza Ghetto Uprising

Anti-Semitism, Weaponized.

One year of Israel’s war on Gaza: Al Jazeera special coverage

Palestine 1920: The Other Side of the Palestinian Story | Al Jazeera World Documentary

this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2025
271 points (93.0% liked)

World News

44801 readers
1339 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS