97

Behavioural metadata extraction underpins the 'surveillance business model', which we think has been shown to undermine democracy. We think it may too enable: manipulation of individual voting at scale via social media microtargeting, spreading fake news, increasing big tech power, mistrust of govs, opinion polarisation, victimisation. RTB [Real Time Bidding] system data can be accessed by anyone, not just advertisers.

Data is sold through Real Time Bidding (RTB) system which is easily accessible and data may be de-anonymised.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] fakeman_pretendname@feddit.uk 9 points 1 week ago

Short answer : Not a lot.

Long answer : If they reach a certain amount, they get discussed in parliament and you get an official response to the issue. The response is normally "no". I don't know of any occasion of one causing major changes.

What it does do though, is force (somebody within) the government to take a position on an issue, and they can no longer say they are ignorant of it. Having an official response means they must explain their counterarguments and reason for denial. If this is then brought up by other means in future, you know what you're arguing against.

Depending on where you live and who your local MP is, you may get better results writing to your local MP, who in theory should be supporting the views of their constituents.

Ultimately, it's a bit weak. Perhaps the response is worth it, as a stepping stone to further methods on an issue - though it's been suggested that it's a distraction, making people fill in a form to "get the anger out of their system", and then not protesting or raising awareness by other means.

I still fill them in, but I don't expect much from them.

[-] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago

though it's been suggested that it's a distraction,

I wonder who's initiative it was to set the petitions site up. I cba to find its history rn but it would probably be quite easy to infer what their motivation was.

[-] fakeman_pretendname@feddit.uk 4 points 1 week ago

Tony Blair's in 2006 originally, then it got binned off for a while, but came back under the Tory/Libdem coalition, which has gradually morphed into what we now use. More info on wiki page

Sadly doesn't give us a very good idea behind the intent without, as you say, reading a lot more about it.

[-] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago

Thank you for the thought out response. I appreciate it.

this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2025
97 points (100.0% liked)

United Kingdom

4613 readers
250 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS