294

Mark Rober just set up one of the most interesting self-driving tests of 2025, and he did it by imitating Looney Tunes. The former NASA engineer and current YouTube mad scientist recreated the classic gag where Wile E. Coyote paints a tunnel onto a wall to fool the Road Runner.

Only this time, the test subject wasn’t a cartoon bird… it was a self-driving Tesla Model Y.

The result? A full-speed, 40 MPH impact straight into the wall. Watch the video and tell us what you think!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Ghyste@sh.itjust.works 27 points 2 weeks ago

I seem to recall that fElon prevented the self driving team from utilizing LIDAR for any part of the system, instead demanding that everything run off of optical input. Does anyone else remember the same?

[-] 9point6@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago

Was just thinking this

A single LiDAR sensor prevents this kind of issue

[-] truthfultemporarily@feddit.org 4 points 2 weeks ago

Indeed there is a lidar car in the video and it works way better in many scenarios.

[-] Flames5123@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago

Even RADAR prevents this and the cars had RADAR! They started disabling RADAR for the older cars since the new ones don’t even have the hardware installed.

[-] Ghyste@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago

I'm trying to find an article that covers what I remember but I know for sure that it's been a good while since I saw the info I recall. Hopefully I can dig something up.

[-] Arbiter@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

Iirc they were using a combination of lidar and radar, but Elmo wanted to cut costs.

[-] cyd@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

Funny thing is, the price of lidar is dropping like a stone; they are projected to be sub-$200 per unit soon. The technical consensus seems to be settling in on 2 or 3 lidars per car plus optical sensors, and Chinese EV brands are starting to provide self driving in baseline models, with lidars as part of the standard package.

[-] ieatpwns@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

Did he want to cut costs or did he want a network of cameras at his control all over the world?

[-] thejml@lemm.ee 1 points 2 weeks ago
[-] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

What's cool is that Teslas used to have radar sensors, at least, but Elon removed them from production to save money. Even if you have a car from back then, the software no longer uses them and they'll just physically unplug them the next time you have the car serviced, as it's just a drain on the battery at this point 🙃

[-] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 5 points 2 weeks ago

meanwhile our subaru has lidar for adaptive cruise control and emergency braking

[-] fulg@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I didn’t realize EyeSight had different versions, on the Solterra it looks like it is indeed LIDAR.

My Crosstrek has the older dual camera setup for depth perception, it would not be fooled by a picture of a road on a wall… I’m surprised the Teslas are.

[-] scarabic@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Yes. He took too much inspiration from Stanford University’s “Stanley” winning the DARPA Grand Challenge in 2005. This was an early completion to build viable autonomous vehicles. Most of them looked like tanks covered in radar dishes but Stanford wound up taking home the gold with just an SUV with cameras on it.

It was an impressive achievement in computer vision, and the LiDAR-encrusted vehicles wound up looking like over-complex dinosaurs. There’s a great documentary about it narrated by John Lithgow (who, throughout it, pronounces the word robot as “ro-butt”). Elon watched it, made up his mind, and like a moron, hasn’t changed it in 20 years. I’m almost Musk’s age so I know how the years speed up as we go on. He probably thinks about the Stanford win as something that happened relatively recently. Especially with his mind on - ahem - other things, he’s not keeping up with recent developments out in the real world.

Rober just made Musk look like the absolute tool he is. And I’m a little worried that we may see people out there staging real world versions of this somehow with actual dangerous obstacles, not a cartoonish foam wall.

[-] KayLeadfoot@fedia.io 2 points 2 weeks ago

I did low-key get the squiggles before writing the article. I thought, from an ethical hacking disclosure-type perspective, that this info might cause folks to... well, ya know, paint tunnels on walls.

Then I looked, the cat was already out of the bag, the video had something like 5 million views on it in the 4 hours it took me to draft the article. So I shared it, but I definitely did have that thought cross my mind. I am also a little worried on that score.

[-] SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago

Yes, I recall at the time experts saying it was a terrible mistake and Elon saying Machine learning will bridge the gap.

The real reason was to increase margins.

[-] kokesh@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Came here to actually write this. Everyone remembers that. He made Tesler the hated shit it is today.

[-] Ghyste@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago

As a space nut I seriously hope that he never gets a chance to do anything similar with SpaceX. Thankfully he's mostly been kept away from important things thus far.

Don't get me wrong, I know SpaceX's closet is overflowing with skeletons. But since Congress has been so kind as to continuously cut NASA's budget for the last few decades, I have to rely on SpaceX and other private companies to keep our space endeavors going.

[-] paraphrand@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

I remember there being claims from him or his team about lidar being a dead end that would not scale as well as computer vision.

[-] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

I believe he claimed that since humans use their vision to drive that computer vision was more than enough.

I don’t know about you, but I also rely on sounds & feel when I drive. I also know that the human eye has evolved to detect motion, filter out extraneous information, and send just the important bits to the brain so that it doesn’t get overloaded with everything the eye sees. Computer vision is the exact opposite from that, having to process every bit of every image the camera sees.

[-] theterrasque@infosec.pub 3 points 2 weeks ago

since humans use their vision to drive that computer vision was more than enough

Surprised he didn't swap out the wheels with legs while he was at it

[-] KayLeadfoot@fedia.io 1 points 2 weeks ago
[-] bluGill@fedia.io 3 points 2 weeks ago

I also know of many times my vision fails. Driving into a sunrise for example

[-] JimVanDeventer@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

I don’t know about you, but I also rely on sounds & feel when I drive.

Of course. When I feel myself driving into a wall, I stop immediately.

[-] brsrklf@jlai.lu 1 points 2 weeks ago

You must connect with the road, every km or so stop and hug the asphalt.

[-] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 2 weeks ago

Tesla never had LIDAR. That's the little spinny thing you see on Waymo cars. They had RADAR, and yes it was removed in 2021 due to supply shortages and just...never reinstalled.

this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2025
294 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

68190 readers
1973 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS