481
stop
(sh.itjust.works)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2025
481 points (95.1% liked)
Programmer Humor
28883 readers
2117 users here now
Welcome to Programmer Humor!
This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!
For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.
Rules
- Keep content in english
- No advertisements
- Posts must be related to programming or programmer topics
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
We have a principal engineer on our team that is pushing this sort of style, hard.
It's essentially obfuscation, no one else on the team can really review, nevermind understand and maintain what they write. It's all just functional abstractions on top of abstractions, every little thing is a function, even property/field access is extracted out to a function instead of just.... Using dot notation like a normal person.
Java, the most functional programming language there is.
Well, this is in JS to be clear
Instead of
const name = user.nameIt's
const userToName(user) => user.name;const name = userToName(user);Ad nauseum.
I was afraid you’d say that. That’s stupid.
Do they give a reason for why that’s ‘necessary’?
(Also it should be
const userToName = (user) => user.name;)That was the impression I got about functional programming, from what little I read about it like 15 years ago. Sounds like somebody found a pretty hammer and everything became a nail.