19
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by Nighed@feddit.uk to c/mildlyinfuriating@lemmy.world

They sell things that come in cups, or with napkins. Lots of people cycle/run/walk here instead of driving, seems pretty stupid.

Taking away the bins doesn't mean you don't produce rubbish....

Edit: I think there is still a bin IN the cafe, but most people eat/drink outside. Lots of people asking staff where the bins are. Still hypocritical I think though? (And still mildly infuriating to remove well used bins!)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Apocalypteroid@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

I used to work for the Woodland Trust and believe that this is the right thing to do. Bins in woodlands do not get emptied often and will often overflow and attract unwanted pests like rats. Rats will also eat the eggs of ground nesting birds and cause other environmental issues.

If they are selling food on site then the food vendor should have a bin that their customers can use inside their cabin/cafe and dispose of the waste daily as part of the service.

[-] Hawke@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Bins in woodlands do not get emptied often and will often overflow

Think I found the problem— why not do the obvious thing and empty them more often?

[-] abigscaryhobo@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Genuine answer here, as someone who volunteers for the parks. A lot of times the budgets are tight, depending on whose responsibility it is to clean up the area and what services are there/nearby, the staffing just isn't available. Yeah it's a pretty easy thing to do in theory, but in practice when it becomes "okay and 2 hours of your shift is driving out there and emptying the cans" it's not a far leap to just "Remove the cans, make the snack stand dispose of their garbage on their own"

I mean I get it, the cans are nice but also, like you're an adult. Throw your trash away on your own.

"But then people will throw it on the ground!" Okay then pay someone to stand out there and slap every idiot that thinks littering is okay because they couldn't find a can in 10 seconds.

It's common decency in plenty of places around the world to take your garbage with you until you find a can. It's not hard.

[-] mmddmm@lemm.ee 2 points 2 weeks ago

That's literally the patio of a commercial place that sells food enclosed in trash.

If they rely on volunteers to clean the trash, a lot of people are doing lots of things very wrong.

[-] Cryophilia@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago

It’s common decency in plenty of places around the world to take your garbage with you until you find a can.

But you've removed all the cans rather than fix your budgeting problems.

[-] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

I’m sure the parking lot or your house has one. Why do you think other people should pay for your laziness to dispose of your own garbage?

[-] macaw_dean_settle@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

With that logic, why go to this park? The parking lot is outside and with nature and your house would have trees and nature around. So we should just all stay home near our trashcans. Ridiculous.

[-] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

… did you hit your head today?

[-] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

That's the function of the parks service. And it's taxpayer money, so it's my money paying for it too.

[-] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

So now instead of them being able to provide other services they need to continue piddling money away so you can be lazy and throw your trash where you please?

People don’t want to pay more taxes so you can just be lazy and need garbage cans every 20 feet dude… shitty take lmfao. They would much rather the money go to making things better, not perpetuating laziness and creating eyesores.

Do you think people like seeing and smelling garbage bins while taking a nature walk?! Seriously?

[-] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Better than seeing trash everywhere dude

[-] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago

They already have to because of the bins… remove them and people remove their garbage and all of a sudden. No garbage to look at it, no bins, no smell, no rodents and a pristine park.

And you WANT to ruin it with excessive garbage cans to ease your laziness?

You don’t return carts after shopping either I bet.

[-] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

remove them and people remove their garbage

This is some cute magical thinking

[-] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago

Works plenty of places, but of course a lazy ignorant mook like you wouldn’t be able to realize it.

Check Japan out for some precedence dude….

[-] macaw_dean_settle@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Bad example. People often complain about this in Japan.

[-] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Americans do* the rest of world praises it.

[-] abigscaryhobo@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago

The function of the parks service is to maintain the parks, rivers, and forests (aka nature) of the area they operate. Idk what in your view makes "nature conservation" overlap with "making sure entitled lazy dickheads have a trash can every 10 feet they can ignore" but you might want to reevaluate your stance here. Govt funding is tight enough for these agencies trying to do what they can as it is. Catering to "But I don't want to hold my trash for 10 minutes" like a whining baby is not their concern. Nor should anyones be. You're a grown adult. Take your trash, shove it in a pocket or a bag until you can throw it away like an adult.

[-] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Do you think you are currently speaking to any litterers? What in the world makes you think a) your rant will ever reach them, and b) that it will make them suddenly become decent people?

People are shit. You get trash in the bin or trash on the ground. I prefer the bin.

[-] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago

Well you’ve made it quite clear with your comments that you are a lazy litterer who also doesn’t return their carts.

So yeah, there’s atleast one.

[-] macaw_dean_settle@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago
[-] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

Lmfao I appreciate that people still think this is Reddit and correcting a minor mistake is going to be upvoted…

[-] stephen01king@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 weeks ago

I always upvote polite correction like those.

[-] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Nothing polite about correcting someone’s grammar when it doesn’t affect the conversation mate.

Also, the irony… correction should be plural in your comment…. Fucking lol.

[-] Apocalypteroid@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

Because that would mean employing someone to empty them regularly, and as most woodland is few and far between in this country most woodland owners deem that an unnecessary expense.

[-] SouthEndSunset@lemm.ee 0 points 2 weeks ago

There’s a cafe and forestry workers, is it that time consuming?

[-] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago

And how do they get the garbage to the dump? You would need vehicles, insurance, garage, maintenance departments… it all snowballs.

Just be responsible for your own garbage, not a hard concept.

[-] SouthEndSunset@lemm.ee 1 points 2 weeks ago

The cafe will have a contract with someone to take away waste, this waste could be included.

I totally agree people should take away rubbish that they create, unfortunately many dont.

[-] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Who’s gonna do it and pay for it?

If people weren’t such babies and cleaned up after themselves, we wouldn’t need to waste taxpayers money on cleaning up after adults who could do it themselves.

[-] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Who’s gonna do it and pay for it?

Sounds like there's a bunch of people and some kind of organisation that runs this area, after all, they made the decision to take the bins away. This is also a cafe area, so someone's making money off this zone.

THOSE PEOPLE ARE.

[-] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago

Yes… the sign is from the forest ministry no? So the government that your tax money pays for would be dealing with it.

If this was a businesses garbage, those usually aren’t overrun, since they have plenty of time and money to deal with the garbage.

But government agencies…? Give your head a shake bud.

[-] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

he forest ministry no? So the government that your tax money pays for would be dealing with it.

great. good.

But government agencies…? Give your head a shake bud.

???

[-] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago

The problem isn't that a park removed their trash cans. The problem is that a cafe removed their trash cans.

I dunno about you, but if I see a bin in a public area, I assume some is paid to empty it. I don’t empty it myself.

[-] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world -3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

If you took your own garbage with you like a decent human, there would be no bins to be emptied and you would have better uses for that tax money.

Where did I imply the public should be doing it….?

So your entire argument is public bins are useless?

You understand that people should clean up after themselves whether or not there is a bin, but offering a bin is a useful service that greatly helps people out can be compatible right.

[-] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

The cafe has a bin inside of it, put your garbage there before leaving.

They removed the bins from the public forestry path.

Not everyone is using the cafe? People are allowed not to eat in a private restaurant. The availability of a bin shouldn’t be dependent on spending money.

[-] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

If you’re not eating at the cafe, what you bring with you, you should bring out with you. Why should someone else clean up and taxpayers foot the bill for the garbage you brought to a park?

And no I never said public bins were useless, I was responding to a specific comment. Don’t put words in my mouth.

Be a decent human and clean up after yourself.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago

So, I agree with you, but them providing bins implies they're going to be responsible and empty them, and people should feel free to use them. They shouldn't have to try to predict which cans are fine to use and which ones aren't.

This post is them doing the correct thing if they aren't going to do that, and it isn't an issue. Put your trash in your pocket or your backpack or something. It isn't hard.

[-] Nighed@feddit.uk 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

This is right by the cafe/site office/car park though. The reception desk is about 20m to the left and staffed during daylight hours year round.

Not like it's in the middle of nowhere.

I get your point, there are very few bins elsewhere (mostly by the other car parks) and that's fine. It's just that the place that gives you rubbish makes it hard to responsibly get rid of it.

[-] Railcar8095@lemm.ee 0 points 2 weeks ago

Isn't there a bin at the cafe?

[-] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 weeks ago

I think that's the problem. I interpret it as the cafe removed their bins.

[-] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

It’s a sign from the forest ministry, they removed their bins.

Why on earth would you think a sign from the ministry of forestry would be speaking for and removing a cafes bins…?

Read the fucking sign for fucks sakes. It’s literally, right fucking there.

[-] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago

Read the fucking post for fucks sake. It's right fucking there.

The sign says the bins were removed. The post headline says the bins were removed from the cafe area. This is a cafe at a visitor center at a forest.

Before you go insulting the reading comprehension of others, try working on your own.

[-] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 1 points 2 weeks ago

So empty them.

this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2025
19 points (88.0% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

38779 readers
645 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-The Community !actuallyinfuriating has been born so that's where you should post the big stuff.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS