this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2025
170 points (96.2% liked)
Asklemmy
47180 readers
731 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy 🔍
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
I disagree. You can always aim to be neutral, stick to the facts, and not favor a specific side. You'll never fully achieve it, but you can come close to it.
Sticking to the facts doesn't conflict with taking sides, though. If someone says the sky is blue, and someone else says the sky is green, that doesn't mean that the sky must be purple.
Objectivity is a great value to have, but with objectivity comes bias. We would be biased in favor of the person saying the sky is blue, we would not be neutral, but we would be objective and rational.
Refusing to take any side out of a percieved inherent value in moderation is irrational and goes against objectivity.
The rational course is to remain objective, while recognizing inherent bias and working with that, rather than trying to feign impartiality.