78
submitted 1 year ago by rab@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] rab@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago

None of those are even close to as effective as not having kids though.

I'm not even talking carbon footprint entirely though, I mean why would you bring a human into a world that is almost surely over.

[-] mr_stevenson_ii@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago

Exactly. If you have a heart, you don’t generate an innocent being to suffer and to unavoidably increase the suffering.

[-] EhForumUser@lemmy.ca -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If the world is almost surely over, then you won't have a heart. These are the concerns of someone who thinks that life will go on for a long time.

[-] mr_stevenson_ii@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

I’m not surprised that you feel defensive.

[-] EhForumUser@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm not surprised either. I doubt anyone here failed to feel the concern that we have a long life ahead, allowing hearts to remain and children to suffer.

But is it realistic? On what basis do you think we have such longevity ahead of us? Perhaps the claim that the world is about to end is the more viable conclusion?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2023
78 points (98.8% liked)

Canada

7106 readers
269 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Regions


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Universities


💵 Finance / Shopping


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social & Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS