view the rest of the comments
World News
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. âIronicâ prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the articleâs mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
Fuck, I'm pro mask and all, but... that's gonna be a hard sell. And tbh I fucking enjoy not wearing one anymore (unless I'm sick or something).
Maybe "something" = "at high risk of getting stick?"
đ
Edit: maybe I should have noted that I agreed with "Maybe "something" = "at high risk of getting stick?"" But just thought it was funny that he had to point that out.
I was just typing up the same thing. I the UK this would need to get really bad for any sort of compliance to take place
Ah a medical expert as I can see. Please go ahead and enlighten me: where is your systemic proof of the ineffectiveness of masks as a precaution to reduce the spread of Covid?
If it's not too much to ask, please be so kind to provide the statistics regarding the different severity levels and corresponding number of cases of Covid while comparing that to the common cold.
From "Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses" Jefferson Et Al 2023 Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub6 .... Medical/surgical masks compared to no masks
We included 12 trials (10 clusterâRCTs) comparing medical/surgical masks versus no masks to prevent the spread of viral respiratory illness (two trials with healthcare workers and 10 in the community). Wearing masks in the community probably makes little or no difference to the outcome of influenzaâlike illness (ILI)/COVIDâ19 like illness compared to not wearing masks (risk ratio (RR) 0.95, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84 to 1.09; 9 trials, 276,917 participants; moderateâcertainty evidence. Wearing masks in the community probably makes little or no difference to the outcome of laboratoryâconfirmed influenza/SARSâCoVâ2 compared to not wearing masks (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.42; 6 trials, 13,919 participants; moderateâcertainty evidence)
Imagine the survival rate without precautions. (e.g. look at Italy 2020)
You're wrong.
https://theconversation.com/did-swedens-controversial-covid-strategy-pay-off-in-many-ways-it-did-but-it-let-the-elderly-down-188338
I think the way you put it is blunt but a lot of people feel this way.
Maybe instead of speaking your mind you can speak with facts next time.
Yeah, the way you speak and argue clearly shows how much of not "a dumb fuck" you are. Veeeery convincing.
So what's the survival rate of a cold?
Like 120%
If I answer, will you actually listen? I'll believe you if you start by answering my question of what the survival/mortality rate of the common cold is.
Where the fuck do you live that more than 1/200 people get struck by lightning?
Fuck it. You say 99.6% survival rate, as if you can effectively round it up to 100% and say it's totally harmless. What it really means is that about 1 in 200 will die. Here in the Denver metro area, where I live, that's almost 120,000 dead. No doubt they spend time in the hospital first. We don't have the hospital infrastructure to support that kind of influx, and that's not even counting those who need medical care but survive.
My daughter was born just over a year ago. She was 3 months early, and I WISH she were 2 pounds because that would've been more reassuring considering her actual birth weight would be rounded down to a single pound. She only got fully released from needing oxygen about a week ago. I can only imagine how things would've been if all the wonderful doctors and nurses we were fortunate enough to have were assigned to COVID units because the world ran the way you wished it did. Hell, I'm thankful we didn't have to deal with it the way things actually were in 2020. Because what gives us a cold could send her straight back to the hospital and hopefully she gets out.
You don't do much critical thinking in your free time, or do you?
I love how he feels the need to put the smily face on every comment when it is crystal clear that he is malding behind the screen
Have you heard of the psychological condition of paranoia? Maybe you should look into it and talk to some professionals.
"High five everyone! We got these guys to wear MASKS! LOLOL! Hey, why'd my stocks go down? Oh well, MASKS!!! đ€Ł "