view the rest of the comments
World News
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
Because my narrative actually makes sense and adds up, unlike the “official” absence of a narrative.
So you have evidence for this?
My narrative adds up. Yours does not.
I did not present any narrative at all. I only asked you to support your claim.
And I did. I stated that you cannot find fault in my narrative. If you provide a narrative other than mine, it is likely faulty because it is contrived.
Well, I posit that it was done by mind controlling aliens from Mars. I will also provide no evidence, and you cannot disagree or find fault in my narrative as yours is contrived.
That’s just defensive adolescent reduction to absurdity from you. No pigeonchess please.
My narrative stands up to criticism. The “official nonstory” does not.
Yes, that's my point. There's nothing in your narrative to criticize, because you haven't provided any evidence. It's pure conjecture.
Yes my narrative fills in the blanks of what actually happened in Butler PA, but it absolutely is not conjecture. I explain how all of the REAL things that happened in Butler PA that are public knowledge all fit together and make sense. Nothing is conjecture. The school roof was in clear view of the rally, yet outside the “official perimeter” and trump’s SS was set up in its direction with a clear view of the roof. Crooks, a loner trumpee who liked guns and had previously participated in rightwing military propaganda as a younger kid, was witnessed on the roof by multiple rallygoers approximately ten minutes before the shootings. There was a man in black filmed on the watertower directly behind Crooks during the shootings. This is all available online, including the aerial layout of the rally grounds. There is no motive for Crooks. There is no evidence Crooks fired his gun. There is no evidence trump was shot. The fight fight fight was against human nature. It was staged. None of this is conjecture. Do better please.
There is no evidence for any of these statements.
Edit: in your own words: "Bro there are no “facts” available anywhere about the staged murders of Crooks & Comperatore." So anything you say regarding them is by definition speculation.